Cited by 8Astro and Planetary ScienceIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Saturn's atmosphere at 1–10 kilometer resolution

Open access
Ingersoll, Andrew P., Ewald, Shawn P., Sayanagi, Kunio M., Blalock, John J.·2018·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Abstract We present images of Saturn from the final phases of the Cassini mission, including images with 0.5 km per pixel resolution, as high as any Saturn images ever taken. Notable features are puffy clouds resembling terrestrial cumulus, shadows indicating cloud height, dome and bowl shaped cloud structures indicating upwelling and downwelling in anticyclones and cyclones respectively, and filaments, which are thread‐like clouds that remain coherent over distances of 20,000 km. From the coherence of the filaments, we give upper bounds on the diffusivity and kinetic energy dissipation. A radiative transfer analysis by Sanz‐Requena et al. (2018) indicates that methane‐band imagery is most useful in determining cloud and haze properties in the 60–250 mbar pressure range. Our methane‐band imagery finds haze in this pressure range covering 64°‐74°planetocentric latitude. Filaments lie within the haze, and cumulus clouds lie below it, but pressure levels are uncertain below the 250 mbar level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2018gl079255

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingersoll, A. P., Ewald, S. P., Sayanagi, K. M., & Blalock, J. J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Hampton University (US)
Corresponding author
Ingersoll, Andrew P.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2018-08-11
Volume
45
Issue
15
Pages
7851-7856
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2884013103
Cited by
8
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1411952)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Saturn atmosphere, high-resolution imaging, cumulus clouds, anticyclones, cyclones, upwelling and downwelling, kinetic energy dissipation, diffusion coefficient, haze, cloud height, Cassini mission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review