The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios
Open accessAbstract
There is strong evidence that climate change will increase drought risk and severity, but these conclusions depend on the regions, seasons, and drought metrics being considered. We analyze changes in drought across the hydrologic cycle (precipitation, soil moisture, and runoff) in projections from Phase Six of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The multimodel ensemble shows robust drying in the mean state across many regions and metrics by the end of the 21st century, even following the more aggressive mitigation pathways (SSP1‐2.6 and SSP2‐4.5). Regional hotspots with strong drying include western North America, Central America, Europe and the Mediterranean, the Amazon, southern Africa, China, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Compared to SSP3‐7.0 and SSP5‐8.5, however, the severity of drying in the lower warming scenarios is substantially reduced and further precipitation declines in many regions are avoided. Along with drying in the mean state, the risk of the historically most extreme drought events also increases with warming, by 200–300% in some regions. Soil moisture and runoff drying in CMIP6 is more robust, spatially extensive, and severe than precipitation, indicating an important role for other temperature‐sensitive drought processes, including evapotranspiration and snow. Given the similarity in drought responses between CMIP5 and CMIP6, we speculate that both generations of models are subject to similar uncertainties, including vegetation processes, model representations of precipitation, and the degree to which model responses to warming are consistent with observations. These topics should be further explored to evaluate whether CMIP6 models offer reasons to have increased confidence in drought projections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 · Cited by 11,981
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
O'Neill, B. C., Tebaldi, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Eyring, V., Friedlingstein, P., Hurtt, G., Knutti, R., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Lowe, J., et al. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 4×
“We downloaded diagnostic output from climate models in the CMIP6 database (https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/ search/cmip6/), using the “historical” (1850–2014) simulations conducted as part of the core DECK experiments (Eyring et al., 2016) and four SSPs (2015–2100) from ScenarioMIP (O'Neill et al., 2016).”
MethodInfluentialIncreasing drought under global warming in observations and models
Dai, A. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1633 · Cited by 4,762
Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections
Knutti, R., & Sedláček, J. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1716 · Cited by 1,569
Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought
Kelley, C. P., Mohtadi, S., Cane, M. A., Seager, R., & Kushnir, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421533112 · Cited by 1,379
Twentieth-century hydroclimate changes consistent with human influence
Marvel, K., Cook, B. I., Bonfils, C. J. W., Durack, P. J., Smerdon, J. E., & Williams, A. P. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1149-8 · Cited by 317 · cited 2×
“…(Berg et al., 2017; Lemordant et al., 2018; Mankin et al., 2019; Milly & Dunne, 2016; Swann et al., 2016), and quantified the detection and attribution of climate change signals in observed hydroclimate trends and drought events (Kelley et al., 2015; Marvel et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2015).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citation
Cited by
Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world
Lian, X., Piao, S., Chen, A., Huntingford, C., Fu, B., Li, L. Z. X., Huang, J., Sheffield, J., Berg, A. M., Keenan, T. F., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00144-0 · Cited by 709
Evidence of anthropogenic impacts on global drought frequency, duration, and intensity
Chiang, F., Mazdiyasni, O., & AghaKouchak, A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22314-w · Cited by 689
Ukkola, A. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Roderick, M. L., Abramowitz, G., & Pitman, A. J. (2020) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl087820 · Cited by 528
Zhang, X., Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., Zhang, Y., Feng, S., Xu, Y., & Hao, F. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156021 · Cited by 429
Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China
Su, B., Huang, J., Mondal, S. K., Zhai, J., Wang, Y., Wen, S., Gao, M., Lv, Y., Jiang, S., Jiang, T., et al. (2021) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105375 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Marvel, K., Williams, A. P., Smerdon, J. E., & Anchukaitis, K. J.
- Venue
- Earth's Future
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2328-4277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016397873
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 45.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2019ef001461
- The paper
- Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Marvel, K., Williams, A. P., Smerdon, J. E., & Anchukaitis, K. J. (2020). Twenty‐First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6 Forcing Scenarios. Earth's Future. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ef001461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.