Cited by 1,569Climate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections

Knutti, Reto, Sedláček, Jan·2013·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate1716

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knutti, R., & Sedláček, J.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Knutti, Reto
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2012-10-28
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
369-373
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W1968176769
Cited by
1,569
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 139 · 2017: 143 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 1
FWCI
67.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
CMIP5, climate model projections, model spread, natural climate variability, global temperature change, precipitation change, IPCC AR5, model resolution, climate change impacts, uncertainty in climate projections, model convergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review