Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6

Open access
Sellar, Alistair A., Walton, Jeremy, Jones, Colin G., Wood, Richard, Abraham, Nathan Luke, Andrejczuk, Miroslaw, Andrews, Martin B., Andrews, Timothy, Archibald, Alex T., de Mora, Lee, Dyson, Harold, Elkington, Mark, Ellis, Richard, Florek, Piotr, Good, Peter, Gohar, Laila, Haddad, Stephen, Hardiman, Steven C., Hogan, Emma, Iwi, Alan, Jones, Christopher D., Johnson, Ben, Kelley, Douglas I., Kettleborough, Jamie, Knight, Jeff R., Köhler, Marcus O., Kuhlbrodt, Till, Liddicoat, Spencer, Linova‐Pavlova, Irina, Mizielinski, Matthew S., Morgenstern, Olaf, Mulcahy, Jane, Neininger, Erica, O'Connor, Fiona M., Petrie, Ruth, Ridley, Jeff, Rioual, Jean‐Christophe, Roberts, Malcolm, Robertson, Eddy, Rumbold, Steven, Seddon, Jon, Shepherd, Harry, Shim, Sungbo, Stephens, Ag, Teixiera, Joao C., Tang, Yongming, Williams, Jonny, Wiltshire, Andy, Griffiths, Paul T.·2020·Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Abstract

We describe the scientific and technical implementation of two models for a core set of experiments contributing to the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The models used are the physical atmosphere‐land‐ocean‐sea ice model HadGEM3‐GC3.1 and the Earth system model UKESM1 which adds a carbon‐nitrogen cycle and atmospheric chemistry to HadGEM3‐GC3.1. The model results are constrained by the external boundary conditions (forcing data) and initial conditions. We outline the scientific rationale and assumptions made in specifying these. Notable details of the implementation include an ozone redistribution scheme for prescribed ozone simulations (HadGEM3‐GC3.1) to avoid inconsistencies with the model's thermal tropopause, and land use change in dynamic vegetation simulations (UKESM1) whose influence will be subject to potential biases in the simulation of background natural vegetation. We discuss the implications of these decisions for interpretation of the simulation results. These simulations are expensive in terms of human and CPU resources and will underpin many further experiments; we describe some of the technical steps taken to ensure their scientific robustness and reproducibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2019ms001946

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Sellar, A. A., Walton, J., Jones, C. G., Wood, R., Abraham, N. L., Andrejczuk, M., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., de Mora, L., Dyson, H., Elkington, M., Ellis, R., Florek, P., Good, P., Gohar, L., Haddad, S., Hardiman, S. C., Hogan, E., Iwi, A., Jones, C. D., Johnson, B., Kelley, D. I., Kettleborough, J., Knight, J. R., Köhler, M. O., Kuhlbrodt, T., Liddicoat, S., Linova‐Pavlova, I., Mizielinski, M. S., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J., Neininger, E., O'Connor, F. M., Petrie, R., Ridley, J., Rioual, J., Roberts, M., Robertson, E., Rumbold, S., Seddon, J., Shepherd, H., Shim, S., Stephens, A., Teixiera, J. C., Tang, Y., Williams, J., Wiltshire, A., & Griffiths, P. T.
Venue
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2020-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
ISSN
1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005468410
Cited by
284
References
70
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2019ms001946
The paper
Sellar, A. A., Walton, J., Jones, C. G., Wood, R., Abraham, N. L., Andrejczuk, M., Andrews, M. B., Andrews, T., Archibald, A. T., de Mora, L., Dyson, H., Elkington, M., Ellis, R., Florek, P., Good, P., Gohar, L., Haddad, S., Hardiman, S. C., Hogan, E., . . . Griffiths, P. T. (2020). Implementation of U.K. Earth System Models for CMIP6. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ms001946

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.