Cited by 21Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesSoil Moisture and Remote SensingClimate variability and models

Data‐Driven Worldwide Quantification of Large‐Scale Hydroclimatic Covariation Patterns and Comparison With Reanalysis and Earth System Modeling

Open access
Ghajarnia, Navid, Kalantari, Zahra, Destouni, Georgia·2021·Water Resources Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Large‐scale covariations of freshwater fluxes and storages on land can critically regulate the balance of green (evapotranspiration) and blue (runoff) water fluxes, and related land‐atmosphere interactions and hydroclimatic hazards. Such large‐scale covariation patterns are not evident from smaller‐scale hydrological studies that have been most common so far, and remain largely unknown for various regions and climates around the world. To contribute to bridging the large‐scale knowledge gaps, we synthesize and decipher hydroclimatic data time series over the period 1980–2010 for 6,405 catchments around the world. From observation‐based data, we identify dominant large‐scale linear covariation patterns between monthly freshwater fluxes and soil moisture (SM) for different world parts and climates. These covariation patterns are also compared with those obtained from reanalysis products and Earth System Models (ESMs). The observation‐based data sets robustly show the strongest large‐scale hydrological relationship to be that between SM and runoff (R), consistently across the study catchments and their different climate characteristics. This predominantly strongest covariation between monthly SM and R is also the most misrepresented by ESMs and reanalysis products, followed by that between monthly precipitation and R. Comparison of observation‐based and ESM results also shows that an ESM may perform well for individual monthly variables, but fail in representing the patterns of large‐scale linear covariations between them. Observation‐based quantification of these patterns, and ESM and reanalysis improvements for their representation are essential for fundamental understanding, and more accurate and reliable modeling and projection of large‐scale hydrological conditions and changes under ongoing global and regional change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020wr029377

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghajarnia, N., Kalantari, Z., & Destouni, G.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ghajarnia, Navid
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2021-10
Volume
57
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W3139260083
Cited by
21
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Water Resources Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2017-00608)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Stockholms Universitet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
soil moisture, runoff, evapotranspiration, freshwater flux, land-atmosphere interactions, hydrological model evaluation, Earth system models, reanalysis data, rainfall-runoff, hydrological projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review