Cited by 85Climate variability and modelsClimate Change and Environmental ImpactMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

How Unexpected Was the 2021 Pacific Northwest Heatwave?

Open access
McKinnon, Karen A., Simpson, Isla R.·2022·Geophysical Research Letters

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The 2021 Pacific Northwest heatwave featured record‐smashing high temperatures, raising questions about whether extremes are changing faster than the mean, and challenging our ability to estimate the probability of the event. Here, we identify and draw on the strong relationship between the climatological higher‐order statistics of temperature (skewness and kurtosis) and the magnitude of extreme events to quantify the likelihood of comparable events using a large climate model ensemble (Community Earth System Model version 2 Large Ensemble [CESM2‐LE]). In general, CESM2 can simulate temperature anomalies as extreme as those observed in 2021, but they are rare: temperature anomalies that exceed 4.5 σ occur with an approximate frequency of one in a hundred thousand years. The historical data does not indicate that the upper tail of temperature is warming faster than the mean; however, future projections for locations with similar climatological moments to the Pacific Northwest do show significant positive trends in the probability of the most extreme events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2022gl100380

Cites

26 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The laws of physics that the method ties to encapsulate do not change from day to day.

    “the laws of physics that we are tying to encapsulate do not change from day to day.”

    From Forecasting Extreme Temperatures in Siberia Using Supervised Learning and Conformal Prediction Regions (2025) · cites this paper as Mckinnon and Simpson, 2022

    The Data and Anomaly Calculation section describes how the authors model temperature anomalies, and the Discussion calls for further study of the physical mechanisms behind extreme events. Neither states that the method encapsulates laws of physics or that those laws do not change from day to day. Searches for that wording and a paraphrase found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKinnon, K. A., & Simpson, I. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
Corresponding author
McKinnon, Karen A.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2022-09-16
Volume
49
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W4296048935
Cited by
83
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1939988, 1852977)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
2021 Pacific Northwest heatwave, temperature extremes, skewness, kurtosis, higher-order statistics, CESM2 large ensemble, climate model ensembles, temperature anomalies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review