Cited by 29Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsAtmospheric Ozone and Climate

Side Effects of Sulfur‐Based Geoengineering Due To Absorptivity of Sulfate Aerosols

Open access
Wunderlin, Elia, Chiodo, Gabriel, Sukhodolov, Timofei, Vattioni, Sandro, Visioni, Daniele, Tilmes, Simone·2024·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Sulfur‐based stratospheric aerosol intervention (SAI) can cool the climate, but also heats the tropical lower stratosphere if done with injections at low latitudes. We explore the role of this heating in the climate response to SAI, by using mechanistic experiments that remove the effects of longwave absorption of sulfate aerosols above the tropopause. If longwave absorption by stratospheric aerosols is disabled, the heating of the tropical tropopause and most of the related side effects are strongly alleviated and the cooling per Tg‐S injected is 40% bigger. Such side‐effects include the poleward expansion of eddy‐driven jets, acceleration of the stratospheric residual circulation, and delay of Antarctic ozone recovery. Our results add to other recent findings on SAI side effects and demonstrate that SAI scenarios with low‐latitude injections of absorptive materials may result in atmospheric effects and regional climate changes that are comparable to those produced by the CO 2 warming signal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2023gl107285

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wunderlin, E., Chiodo, G., Sukhodolov, T., Vattioni, S., Visioni, D., & Tilmes, S.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (CH)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Wunderlin, Elia
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2024-02-23
Volume
51
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W4392146838
Cited by
29
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-1719-2, 1719-2)
  • Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico (s1144)
  • National Supercomputing Centre Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Keywords
stratospheric aerosol injection, sulfate aerosols, tropical tropopause, global cooling, eddy-driven jet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review