Cited by 143Astro and Planetary ScienceIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsPlanetary Science and Exploration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Galileo Probe Doppler Wind Experiment: Measurement of the deep zonal winds on Jupiter.

Open access
Atkinson, David H., Pollack, James B., Seiff, Alvin·1998·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

During its descent into the upper atmosphere of Jupiter, the Galileo probe transmitted data to the orbiter for 57.5 min. Accurate measurements of the probe radio frequency, driven by an ultrastable oscillator, allowed an accurate time history of the probe motions to be reconstructed. Removal from the probe radio frequency profile of known Doppler contributions, including the orbiter trajectory, the probe descent velocity, and the rotation of Jupiter, left a measurable frequency residual due to Jupiter's zonal winds, and microdynamical motion of the probe from spin, swing under the parachute, atmospheric turbulence, and aerodynamic buffeting. From the assumption of the dominance of the zonal horizontal winds, the frequency residuals were inverted and resulted in the first in situ measurements of the vertical profile of Jupiter's deep zonal winds. A number of error sources with the capability of corrupting the frequency measurements or the interpretation of the frequency residuals were considered using reasonable assumptions and calibrations from prelaunch and in‐flight testing. It is found that beneath the cloud tops (about 700 mbar) the winds are prograde and rise rapidly to 170 m/s at 4 bars. Beyond 4 bars to the depth at which the link with the probe was lost, nearly 21 bars, the winds remain constant and strong. Corrections for the high temperatures encountered by the probe have recently been completed and provide no evidence of diminishing or strengthening of the zonal wind profile in the deeper regions explored by the Galileo probe.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/98je00060

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Beebe R., 1994, Jupiter, The Giant Planet
  2. Engstrom S. Prediction of future frequency characteristics for the Galileo probe ultra‐stable oscillator M.S.E.E. thesis Univ. of Idaho Moscow 1994.
  3. Golub G. H., 1983, Matrix Computations
  4. Simpson J. A., 1976, Jupiter, 738
  5. Smith B. A., 1976, Jupiter, 564
  6. Wei Y. Z. Software development for the Galileo Doppler Wind Experiment M.S.E.E. thesis Univ. of Idaho Moscow 1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–142 of 142

Metadata

Authors
Atkinson, D. H., Pollack, J. B., & Seiff, A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
1998-09
Volume
103
Issue
E10
Pages
22911-22928
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984608767
Cited by
143
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
Jupiter, zonal wind, Galileo probe, deep atmosphere, atmospheric turbulence, atmospheric temperature effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review