Cited by 23Bioenergy crop production and managementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

Could biofuel development stress China's water resources?

Open access
Hao, Mengmeng, Jiang, Dong, Wang, Jianhua, Fu, Jingying, Huang, Yaohuan·2017·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Abstract Concerns over energy shortages and global climate change have stimulated developments toward renewable energy. Biofuels have been developed to replace fossil fuels to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and other environmental impacts. However, food security and water scarcity are other growing concerns, and the increased production of biofuels may increase these problems. This study focuses on whether biofuel development would stress China's water resources. Cassava‐based fuel ethanol and sweet sorghum‐based fuel ethanol are the focus of this study because they are the most typical nongrain biofuels in China. The spatial distribution of the total water requirement of fuel ethanol over its life cycle process was simulated using a biophysical biogeochemical model and marginal land as one of the types of input data for the model to avoid impacts on food security. The total water requirement of fuel ethanol was then compared with the spatial distribution of water resources, and the influence of the development of fuel ethanol on water resources at the pixel and river basin region scales was analyzed. The result showed that the total water requirement of fuel ethanol ranges from 37.81 to 862.29 mm. However, considering water resource restrictions, not all of the marginal land is suitable for the development of fuel ethanol. Approximately 0.664 million km 2 of marginal land is suitable for the development of fuel ethanol, most of which is located in the south of China, where water resources are plentiful. For these areas, the value of fuel ethanol's water footprint ranges from 0.05 to 11.90 m 3 MJ −1 . From the water point of view, Liaoning province, Guizhou province, Anhui province and Hunan province can be given priority for the development of fuel ethanol.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12440

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hoekstra AY (2003) Virtual Water Trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade. IHE, Delft.
  2. Luo Q (2008) Sweet Sorghum. China's Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.
  3. Spang ES, Moomaw WR, Gallagher KS, Kirshen PH, Marks DH (2014) The water consumption of energy production: an international comparison. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 105003.
  4. Wei L (2014) Fuel Ethanol Production Technology. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing.
  5. Xia XF, Zhang J, Xi BD (2012) Research on Fuel Ethanol Evaluation and Policy Based on Life Cycle Assessment. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, M., Jiang, D., Wang, J., Fu, J., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Dong
  • Wang, Jianhua
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-21
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
1447-1460
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2586134718
Cited by
23
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571509)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC1201300)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Keywords
biofuel development, water resources, water footprint, bioethanol, cassava, sweet sorghum, marginal land, water scarcity, food security, river basin scale, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review