Cited by 786Asthma and respiratory diseasesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

Open access
Juniper, E.F., Guyatt, G.H., Cox, F.m, Ferrie, P.J., King, D.R.·1999·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The 32-item Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) has shown good responsiveness, reliability and construct validity; properties that are essential for use in clinical trials, clinical practice and surveys. However, to meet the needs of large clinical trials and long-term monitoring, where efficiency may take precedent over precision of measurement, the 15-item self-administered MiniAQLQ has been developed. The MiniAQLQ was tested in a 9-week observational study of 40 adults with symptomatic asthma. Patients completed the MiniAQLQ, the AQLQ, the Short Form (SF)-36, the Asthma Control Questionnaire and spirometry at baseline, 1, 5 and 9 weeks. In patients whose asthma was stable between clinic visits, reliability was very acceptable for the MiniAQLQ (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.83), but not quite as good as for the AQLQ (ICC=0.95). Similarly, responsiveness in the MiniAQLQ (p=0.0007) was good but not quite so good as for the AQLQ (p<0.0001). Construct validity (correlation with other indices of health status) was strong for both the MiniAQLQ and the AQLQ. Criterion validity showed that there was no bias between the instruments (p=0.61) and the correlation between them was high (r=0.90). The Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire has good measurement properties but they are not quite as strong as those of the original Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. The choice of questionnaire should depend on the task at hand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This has been widely acknowledged by previous research, to the extent that it has been included as one of the components of asthma-related QoL measures, such as the AQLQ.

    “This has been widely acknowledged by previous research, to the extent that it has been included as one of the components of asthma-related QoL measures, such as the AQLQ.69”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sanjuas C, Alonso J, Sanchis J, et al. The quality of life questionnaire with asthma patients; the Spanish version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Archivos de Bronconeumologia 1995; 31: 219±226.
  2. Coste J, Guillemin F, Pouchet J, Fermanian J. Metho- dological approaches to shortening composite measure- ment scales. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 247±252.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Cox, F. M., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R.
Affiliations
McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
1999-07
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
32
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2122433348
Cited by
786
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, asthma, health-related quality of life, questionnaire development, measurement properties, reliability statistics, responsiveness, construct validity, criterion validity, short-form questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Asthma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review