Cited by 27Asthma and respiratory diseasesProblem Solving Skills DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Coping and social problem solving correlates of asthma control and quality of life

McCormick, Sean P, Nezu, Christine M, Nezu, Arthur M, Sherman, Michael, Davey, Adam, Collins, Bradley N·2014·Chronic Respiratory Disease

Abstract

In a sample of adults with asthma receiving care and medication in an outpatient pulmonary clinic, this study tested for statistical associations between social problem-solving styles, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life. These variables were measured cross sectionally as a first step toward more systematic application of social problem-solving frameworks in asthma self-management training. Recruitment occurred during pulmonology clinic service hours. Forty-four adults with physician-confirmed diagnosis of asthma provided data including age, gender, height, weight, race, income, and comorbid conditions. The Asthma Control Questionnaire, the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Short Form), and peak expiratory force measures offered multiple views of asthma health at the time of the study. Maladaptive coping (impulsive and careless problem-solving styles) based on transactional stress models of health were assessed with the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised: Short Form. Controlling for variance associated with gender, age, and income, individuals reporting higher impulsive–careless scores exhibited significantly lower scores on asthma control ( β = 0.70, p = 0.001, confidence interval (CI) [0.37–1.04]) and lower asthma-related quality of life ( β = 0.79, p = 0.017, CI [0.15–1.42]). These findings suggest that specific maladaptive problem-solving styles may uniquely contribute to asthma health burdens. Because problem-solving coping strategies are both measureable and teachable, behavioral interventions aimed at facilitating adaptive coping and problem solving could positively affect patient’s asthma management and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1479972313516878

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormick, S. P., Nezu, C. M., Nezu, A. M., Sherman, M., Davey, A., & Collins, B. N.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Hahnemann University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
McCormick, Sean P
Venue
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
  • 1479-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-9731
OpenAlex
W2109921320
Cited by
27
References
35
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronic Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
asthma, asthma control, asthma quality of life, social problem solving, coping styles, maladaptive coping, transactional model of stress and coping, peak expiratory flow
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Asthma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Problem Solving, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Adjustment, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review