The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrophysiological and cognitive function in young euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: EEG abnormalities and neurocognitive deficits have been reported in patients with bipolar affective disorder. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether brain function remains impaired in young bipolar patients who have become euthymic in response to treatment. Methods: Brain function was assessed by quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) power‐spectral mapping and by a battery of neuropsychological tests. The subjects were 29 euthymic bipolar patients aged 18–40 years and 26 healthy volunteers of similar age, IQ and socioeconomic status. Results: Grand means of spectral power of the resting EEG showed significantly (from p<0.01 to p<0.0001) greater power in all wave bands (delta, theta, alpha and beta) in patients compared with controls. The most marked increases were in right temporal theta and left occipital beta power (with eyes open) encompassing brain areas concerned in visuospatial processing. Neurocognitive performance was significantly impaired in the patients compared with controls in a range of visuospatial tasks. Conclusions: The findings show significant disturbance of EEG activity and deficits in visuospatial processing in young bipolar patients despite clinical euthymia. The abnormalities were not related to age of onset or duration of illness and do not appear to be attributable to medication. The cognitive impairments were associated with the number of previous affective episodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900
Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders
Drevets, W. C., Price, J. L., Simpson, J. R., Todd, R. D., Reich, T., Vannier, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386824a0 · Cited by 2,693
Neuropsychological performance of monozygotic twins discordant for bipolar disorder
Gourovitch, M. L., Torrey, E. F., Gold, J. M., Randolph, C., Weinberger, D. R., & Goldberg, T. E. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00148-6 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Berk, M., Kapczinski, F., Andreazza, A. C., Dean, O. M., Giorlando, F., Maes, M., Yücel, M., Gama, C. S., Dodd, S., Dean, B., et al. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.001 · Cited by 1,178
A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder
Robinson, L. J., Thompson, J. M., Gallagher, P., Goswami, U., Young, A. H., Ferrier, I. N., & Moore, P. B. (2006) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.016 · Cited by 962
Self-citationEEG frequency bands in psychiatric disorders: a review of resting state studies
Newson, J. J., & Thiagarajan, T. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00521 · Cited by 863
Kurtz, M. M., & Gerraty, R. T. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0016277 · Cited by 433
What Do We Know About Neuropsychological Aspects Of Schizophrenia?
Palmer, B. W., Dawes, S. E., & Heaton, R. K. (2009) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9109-y · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- El‐Badri, S. M., Ashton, C. H., Moore, P. B., Marsh, V. R., & Ferrier, I. N.
- Venue
- Bipolar Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-87
- ISSN
- 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5618
- OpenAlex
- W2115915686
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological and cognitive function in young euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-5618.2001.030206.x
- The paper
- El‐Badri, S. M., Ashton, C. H., Moore, P. B., Marsh, V. R., & Ferrier, I. N. (2001). Electrophysiological and cognitive function in young euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5618.2001.030206.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
