Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients

Open access
Rasmussen, L. S., Johnson, T., Kuipers, H. M., Kristensen, D., Siersma, V. D., Vila, P., Jolles, J., Papaioannou, A., Abildstrom, H., Silverstein, J. H., Bonal, J. A., Raeder, J., Nielsen, I. K., Korttila, K., Munoz, L., Dodds, C., Hanning, C. D., Moller, J. T.·2003·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication after cardiac and major non‐cardiac surgery with general anaesthesia in the elderly. We hypothesized that the incidence of POCD would be less with regional anaesthesia rather than general. Methods: We included patients aged over 60 years undergoing major non‐cardiac surgery. After giving written informed consent, patients were randomly allocated to general or regional anaesthesia. Cognitive function was assessed using four neuropsychological tests undertaken preoperatively and at 7 days and 3 months postoperatively. POCD was defined as a combined Z score >1.96 or a Z score >1.96 in two or more test parameters. Results: At 7 days, POCD was found in 37/188 patients (19.7%, [14.3–26.1%]) after general anaesthesia and in 22/176 (12.5%, [8.0–18.3%]) after regional anaesthesia, P = 0.06. After 3 months, POCD was present in 25/175 patients (14.3%, [9.5–20.4%]) after general anaesthesia vs. 23/165 (13.9%, [9.0–20.2%]) after regional anaesthesia, P = 0.93. The incidence of POCD after 1 week was significantly greater after general anaesthesia when we excluded patients who did not receive the allocated anaesthetic: 33/156 (21.2%[15.0–28.4%]) vs. 20/158 (12.7%[7.9–18.9%]) (P = 0.04). Mortality was significantly greater after general anaesthesia (4/217 vs. 0/211 (P < 0.05)). Conclusion: No significant difference was found in the incidence of cognitive dysfunction 3 months after either general or regional anaesthesia in elderly patients. Thus, there seems to be no causative relationship between general anaesthesia and long‐term POCD. Regional anaesthesia may decrease mortality and the incidence of POCD early after surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00057.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Rasmussen, L. S., Johnson, T., Kuipers, H. M., Kristensen, D., Siersma, V. D., Vila, P., Jolles, J., Papaioannou, A., Abildstrom, H., Silverstein, J. H., Bonal, J. A., Raeder, J., Nielsen, I. K., Korttila, K., Munoz, L., Dodds, C., Hanning, C. D., & Moller, J. T.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
260-266
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W2121457428
Cited by
559
References
0
FWCI
17.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00057.x
The paper
Rasmussen, L. S., Johnson, T., Kuipers, H. M., Kristensen, D., Siersma, V. D., Vila, P., Jolles, J., Papaioannou, A., Abildstrom, H., Silverstein, J. H., Bonal, J. A., Raeder, J., Nielsen, I. K., Korttila, K., Munoz, L., Dodds, C., Hanning, C. D., & Moller, J. T. (2003). Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomised study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00057.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.