Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium

Abstract

Allergy to chromium is relatively common, often in association with exposure to cement or in leather manufacture. However, in certain locations, there appears to be a relatively large cohort of chromium‐sensitive individuals whose allergy cannot be explained by these common sources. In particular, this group include Israeli housewives with persistent hand eczema and concomitant patch test positivity to chromium. The causation of their allergy has been linked with relatively high levels of chromium contamination in household products. To provide further information in respect of the definition of safe levels for such products, we examined 17 chromium‐allergic individuals to determine their threshold for reaction under closed patch test and repeated open application test (ROAT) conditions. The data derived indicated that, on normal skin, the patch test threshold was 10 ppm chromium; in the presence of an irritant (sodium lauryl sulfate) the threshold was closer to 1 ppm, 2/17 subjects giving 1+ reactions at this concentration. In the more realistic exposure conditions of the ROAT, 8/14 individuals failed to react to 50 ppm, whilst 3/15 reacted to 5 ppm. Interestingly, there was very poor correlation between patch test sensitivity and ROAT sensitivity. To ensure the large majority of chromium‐allergic individuals do not suffer elicitation of their allergy, as well as to limit the development of new chromium‐sensitive subjects, it is recommended that household products adhere to a previously published standard of a maximum limit of 5 ppm, with an ultimate target of 1 ppm contamination by chromium.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bonnevie P, 1939, Aetiologie und Pathogenese der Ekzemkrankheiten.
  2. Nava C, 1987, I sali di cromo e nickel come causa di dermatitie allergica da contatto con detergenti., Med Lav, 78, 405
  3. Kokelj F, 1989, Nickel e cromo nei detergenti da toilette., Boll di Derm Allerg e Prof, 4, 31
  4. Meneghini C L, 1979, Intradermal test in contact allegy to metals., Dermato-venereologica, 59

Cited by

See all 102

Metadata

Authors
Basketter, D., Horev, L., Slodovnik, D., Merimes, S., Trattner, A., & Ingber, A.
Affiliations
  • Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Contact Dermatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
70-74
ISSN
  • 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0536
OpenAlex
W1977937686
Cited by
102
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • American Journal of Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
chromium allergy, patch testing, repeated open application test, household products, hand eczema, housewives, sodium dodecyl sulfate, safe exposure levels
MeSH terms
Adult, Allergens, Chromium, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Skin, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Threshold Limit Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x
The paper
Basketter, D., Horev, L., Slodovnik, D., Merimes, S., Trattner, A., & Ingber, A. (2001). Investigation of the threshold for allergic reactivity to chromium. Contact Dermatitis. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440202.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.