Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunity to cancer: attack and escape in T lymphocyte–tumor cell interaction

Rivoltini, Licia, Carrabba, Matteo, Huber, Veronica, Castelli, Chiara, Novellino, Luisa, Dalerba, Piero, Mortarini, Roberta, Arancia, Giuseppe, Anichini, Andrea, Fais, Stefano, Parmiani, Giorgio·2002·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Tumor cells may express antigens which are recognized in a form of HLA/peptide complexes by T cells. The frequency at which different antigens are seen by T cells of melanoma patients and healthy donors was evaluated by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)/peptide tetramer technology which stains T cells bearing the specific receptor for a given epitope. By this technique, it was found that the majority of metastatic melanoma patients can recognize differentiation antigens (particularly Melan‐A/MART‐1), whereas such a recognition is scanty in the early phase of the disease and in healthy subjects. Despite the presence of melanoma‐specific T cells infiltrating tumor lesions, tumor rejection rarely occurs. Among the different mechanisms of such inefficient antitumor response, this review discusses the possible anti‐T‐cell counterattack mediated by FasL‐positive tumor cells, and shows that FasL is located in the cytoplasm of melanoma cells and is transported in the tumor microenvironment through the release of melanosomes. Additionally, mechanisms of suboptimal T cell activation through tumor cell expression of peptide analogs with antagonist activity are described, together with the possibility of overcoming such anergy induction by the usage of optimized tumor epitopes. Down‐modulation of HLA expression by target tumor cells and its multiple mechanisms is also considered. Finally, we discuss the role of inducible nitric oxide synthases in determining the inhibition of apoptosis in melanoma cells, which can make such tumor cells resistant to the T‐cell attack.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18809.x

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Rivoltini, L., Carrabba, M., Huber, V., Castelli, C., Novellino, L., Dalerba, P., Mortarini, R., Arancia, G., Anichini, A., Fais, S., & Parmiani, G.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
97-113
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2093334570
Cited by
289
References
112
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunity to cancer: attack and escape in T lymphocyte–tumor cell interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18809.x
The paper
Rivoltini, L., Carrabba, M., Huber, V., Castelli, C., Novellino, L., Dalerba, P., Mortarini, R., Arancia, G., Anichini, A., Fais, S., & Parmiani, G. (2002). Immunity to cancer: attack and escape in T lymphocyte–tumor cell interaction. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.18809.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.