CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?

Goodwin, Brett J., Fahrig, Lenore·2002·Oikos
DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We investigated the impact of landscape structure on landscape connectivity using a combination of simulation and empirical experiments. In a previous study we documented the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle ( Trirhabda borealis Blake) in three kinds of patches: habitat (goldenrod) patches and two types of matrix patch (cut vegetation and cut vegetation containing camouflage netting as an impediment to movement). In the current study, we used this information to construct simulation and experimental landscapes consisting of mosaics of these three patch types, to study the effect of landscape structure on landscape connectivity, using the T. borealis beetle as a model system. In the simulation studies, landscape connectivity was based on movements of individual beetles, and was measured in six different ways. The simulations revealed that the six measures of landscape connectivity were influenced by different aspects of landscape structure, suggesting that: (1) landscape connectivity is a poorly defined concept, and (2) the same landscape may have different landscape connectivity values when different measures of landscape connectivity are used. There were two general predictions that held over all measures of landscape connectivity: (1) increasing interpatch distance significantly decreased landscape connectivity and (2) the influence of matrix elements on landscape connectivity was small in comparison to the influence of habitat elements. Empirical mark‐release‐resight experiments using Trirhabda beetles in experimental landscapes supported the simulation results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. 10.2307/2405016 · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98531.x · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00346411 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0022-1902(81)80263-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1139/z90-091 · DOI
  6. 10.5751/ES-00354-060109 · DOI
  7. 10.5751/ES-00109-030104 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0006-3207(87)90047-4 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/1938280 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01101-2 · DOI
  12. 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2211:EOGFOI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2390050 · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051148.x-i1 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/1939348 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0040-5809(92)90032-O · DOI
  17. 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0364:RANAST]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/3802168 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00163-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00208-1 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2937372 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90024-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-4244-2_11 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF02275262 · DOI
  26. Goodwin B. J..2000.Landscape connectivity: The interaction between insect movements and landscape spatial structure. – Ph.D. thesis Carleton Univ.
  27. 10.1139/z01-196 · DOI
  28. 10.1071/PC940194 · DOI
  29. Groom M. J., 1993, Biotic interactions and global change, 24
  30. 10.1007/s100219900011 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2265659 · DOI
  32. 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0239:ETPOSA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0006-3207(85)90043-6 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/3544868 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00082-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1160:OOHPAC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/978-1-4615-9686-8 · DOI
  38. 10.2307/1938162 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/1941448 · DOI
  40. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880312.x · DOI
  41. 10.2307/2937376 · DOI
  42. 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D · DOI
  44. 10.4098/AT.arch.93-1 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/978-94-011-0717-4_6 · DOI
  46. Krohne D. T., 1987, Relative success of residents and immigrants in Peromyscus leucopus, Holarct. Ecol., 10, 196
  47. 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90055-T · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0006-3207(84)90015-6 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90052-Q · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00317.x · DOI
  51. 10.1007/BF00330007 · DOI
  52. 10.2307/3546123 · DOI
  53. 10.1086/284986 · DOI
  54. McCullough D. R., 1996, Metapopulations and wildlife conservation, 375
  55. 10.2307/2937059 · DOI
  56. Merriam G., 1984, Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern, 5
  57. Merriam G., 1991, Nature conservation 2: The Role of Corridors, 133
  58. 10.1007/BF00125093 · DOI
  59. Messina F. J., 1982, Timing of dispersal and ovarian development in goldenrod leaf beetles Trirhabda virgata and T. borealis, Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 74, 78, 10.1093/aesa/75.1.78 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/S1146-609X(97)80075-6 · DOI
  61. Noss R. F., 1993, Ecology of greenways: design and function of linear conservation areas, 43
  62. 10.1007/BF00162741 · DOI
  63. Perry J. N., 1993, Dispersal in a metapopulation neighbourhood model of an annual plant with a seedbank, J. Ecol., 81, 453, 10.2307/2261524 · DOI
  64. 10.2307/3546558 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/BF00125351 · DOI
  66. Potter M. A., 1990, Movement of North Island brown kiwi (Apteryx australis mantelli) between forest remnants, N. Z. J. Ecol., 14, 17
  67. Riitters K. H., 1995, A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics, Landscape Ecol., 10, 23, 10.1007/BF00158551 · DOI
  68. 10.1126/science.257.5069.524 · DOI
  69. 10.1139/cjz-76-1-117 · DOI
  70. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96151.x · DOI
  71. 10.2307/3802590 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90320-Z · DOI
  73. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb00160.x · DOI
  74. Schmigelow F. K. A., 2002, Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest, Ecol. Appl., 12, 375
  75. 10.2307/2265590 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00556.x · DOI
  77. Soulé M. E., 1991, Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors, 3
  78. St Clair C. C., 1998, Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps, Conserv. Ecol., 2, 13
  79. 10.1086/284656 · DOI
  80. 10.1007/BF02447516 · DOI
  81. 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08020373.x · DOI
  83. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95270.x · DOI
  84. 10.1023/A:1011112719782 · DOI
  85. 10.1023/A:1008177324187 · DOI
  86. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x · DOI
  87. 10.2307/3546904 · DOI
  88. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0586:IEOFCA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  89. 10.2307/1938510 · DOI
  90. 10.1007/BF00157696 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/BF02071811 · DOI
  92. 10.2307/3565577 · DOI
  93. Wilcove D. S., 1986, Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity, 237
  94. 10.1086/284386 · DOI
  95. 10.2307/2265819 · DOI
  96. 10.1023/A:1008030215600 · DOI
  97. 10.2307/3545811 · DOI
  98. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1340:MRTPSI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  99. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1019:SSFLLI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Goodwin, B. J., & Fahrig, L.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
552-570
ISSN
  • 0030-1299
  • 1600-0706
DOI
10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x
Cited by
193
References
2
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 115 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review