The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems
Abstract
Carrion use by terrestrial vertebrates is much more prevalent than conventional theory implies, and, rather than a curiosity of animal behavior, is a key ecological process that must be accounted for. Human aversion to rotted substances and difficulties associated with identifying scavenged material in studies of food habits have contributed to the relative lack of information concerning scavenging behavior in vertebrates. Several lines of evidence, however, suggest that carrion resources are more extensively used by vertebrates than has been widely assumed: 1) a substantial number of animals die from causes other than predation and become available to scavengers, 2) a wide variety of vertebrate scavengers, rather than microbes or arthropods, consume most available carcasses, and 3) intense competition exists between vertebrate scavengers and decomposers, especially in warm climates. Although vultures are best adapted to use carrion, nearly all vertebrate predators are also scavengers to some extent. The costs and benefits associated with carrion use influences the evolution of scavenging behavior in vertebrates, resulting in a continuum of facultative scavengers that use carrion to varying degrees. The realized usage of carrion by a vertebrate species is influenced by the speed and efficiency with which it forages, its visual and olfactory abilities, and its capacity for detoxifying products of decomposition. A deeper understanding of carrion use by facultative scavengers will improve our knowledge of community and ecosystem processes, especially the flow of energy through food webs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity–stability debate
McCann, K. S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012234 · Cited by 3,143
Herbivores. Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites.
Wilcock, C. C., Rosenthal, G. A., & Janzen, D. H. (1981) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259845 · Cited by 1,984
Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature.
McCann, K., Hastings, A., & Huxel, G. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27427 · Cited by 1,657
Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites
Chapman, R. F. (1980) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(80)90169-3 · Cited by 1,431
Serengeti: Dynamics of an Ecosystem.
Yalden, D. W., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Norton-Griffiths, M. (1980) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259478 · Cited by 1,217
Locomotion: Energy Cost of Swimming, Flying, and Running
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.177.4045.222 · Cited by 950
A Summer Carrion Study of the Baby Pig Sus Scrofa Linnaeus
Payne, J. A. (1965) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934999 · Cited by 949
THE ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR OF BURYING BEETLES
Scott, M. P. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.595 · Cited by 608
Why Fruits Rot, Seeds Mold, and Meat Spoils
Janzen, D. H. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283200 · Cited by 564
Herbivores. Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites.
Dirzo, R., Rosenthal, G. A., & Janzen, D. H. (1981) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402499 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland
Selva, N., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., & Wajrak, A. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-158 · Cited by 343
Humans and Scavengers: The Evolution of Interactions and Ecosystem Services
Moleón, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Margalida, A., Carrete, M., Owen-Smith, N., & Donázar, J. A. (2014) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biu034 · Cited by 257
The Comparative Effects of Large Carnivores on the Acquisition of Carrion by Scavengers
Allen, M. L., Elbroch, L. M., Wilmers, C. C., & Wittmer, H. U. (2015) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/681004 · Cited by 174
Top carnivore decline has cascading effects on scavengers and carrion persistence
Cunningham, C. X., Johnson, C. N., Barmuta, L. A., Hollings, T., Woehler, E. J., & Jones, M. E. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.1582 · Cited by 112
Zheng, L., Crippen, T. L., Holmes, L., Singh, B., Pimsler, M. L., Benbow, M. E., Tarone, A. M., Dowd, S., Yu, Z., Vanlaerhoven, S. L., et al. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02563 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- DeVault, T. L., Rhodes, Jr., & Shivik, J. A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-04
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-234
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2137920389
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x
- The paper
- DeVault, T. L., Rhodes, Jr., & Shivik, J. A. (2003). Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.