Cited by 77Skin Protection and AgingTextile materials and evaluationsDyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

Influence of wetness on the ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) of textiles: in vitro and in vivo measurements

Gambichler, Thilo, Hatch, Kathryn L., Avermaete, Annelies, Altmeyer, Peter, Hoffmann, Klaus·2002·Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Clothing is an important product for sunburn protection and skin cancer prevention. The moisture content of a fabric, which can increase during its wearing, may decrease the fabric's capability of protecting the skin from solar UV radiation, that is, lower its UPF (ultraviolet protection factor). Due to limited data about the effect of fabric wetness on UPF, this study was undertaken to investigate the following: (a) the effect of saturating a variety of fabrics with tap water and with salt water on fabric UPF and (b) whether wetted‐fabric UPF values reflect only the fact that the fabric is wet during testing or the fact that the skin is hydrated and the fabric is wet. Methods: For objective a, 69 summer fabrics were spectrophotometrically (in vitro) assessed when “dry” and when saturated with tap and salt water. In vitro UPFs, percent UVA transmission and percent UVB transmission values were calculated from the transmission data. For objective b, 100% cotton and 100% polyester fabrics were tested in vivo to determine in vivo UPF values. The minimal erythema dose (MED) was determined for each of the 12 subjects on unprotected “dry” skin and on “hydrated” unprotected skin. MED protected was determined when the subject's skin was covered with “dry” and with saturated fabric. In vivo UPFs were calculated using this data. Student's paired t‐tests were used to determine the effect of wetting. Results: With one exception, in vitro UPF values were the same when the fabrics were saturated with tap water and when they were saturated with salt water. However, saturating the fabrics with water had different effects on the UPF, UVA transmission, and UVB transmission values. For linen, viscose and polyester fabrics, UPF significantly increased. For the cotton fabrics and the polyester + TiO 2 fabrics, UPF significantly decreased. For the modal + TiO 2 fabrics and the polyester crepe + TiO 2 fabrics, UPF significantly increased. From the in vivo testing, the MED of the “hydrated unprotected” skin was not different than the MED of “dry unprotected skin.” Values obtained from subtracting dry‐fabric in vivo UPF values from dry‐fabric in vitro values and subtracting wet‐fabric in vivo UPF values from wet‐fabric in vitro values are not different. Conclusion: Fabrics do not need to be tested when saturated with tap and with salt water. Testing fabrics wet and dry should be done, as the effect of saturating fabric on UPF value varies. Fortunately, UPF values for wetted fabrics reveal only the effect of increased moisture content in the fabric and have nothing to do with wetting of the skin by the fabric.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2002.180105.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gambichler, T., Hatch, K. L., Avermaete, A., Altmeyer, P., & Hoffmann, K.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
29-35
ISSN
  • 0905-4383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0781
OpenAlex
W2079579907
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Keywords
UV protection factor, skin hydration, minimal erythema dose, titanium dioxide, polyesters, linen, rayon, sunburn protection
MeSH terms
Adult, Erythema, Female, Humans, Male, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Protection, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Spectrophotometry, Textiles, Ultraviolet Rays, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review