Cited by 98Skin Protection and AgingDyeing and Modifying Textile FibersTextile materials and evaluations

Reduction of ultraviolet transmission through cotton T-shirt fabrics with low ultraviolet protection by various laundering methods and dyeing: clinical implications

Wang, Steven Q., Kopf, Alfred W., Marx, Jeffrey, Bogdan, Alexandru, Polsky, David, Bart, Robert S.·2001·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background The public has long been instructed to wear protective clothing against ultraviolet (UV) damage. Objective Our purpose was to determine the UV protection factor (UPF) of two cotton fabrics used in the manufacture of summer T-shirts and to explore methods that could improve the UPF of these fabrics. Methods Each of the two types of white cotton fabrics (cotton T-shirt and mercerized cotton print cloth) used in this study was divided into 4 treatment groups: (1) water-only (machine washed with water), (2) detergent-only (washed with detergent), (3) detergent-UV absorber (washed with detergent and a UV absorber), and (4) dyes (dyed fabrics). Ultraviolet transmission through the fabrics was measured with a spectrophotometer before and after laundry and dyeing treatments. Based on UV transmission through these fabrics, the UPF values were calculated. Results Before any treatments, the mean UPFs were 4.94 for the T-shirt fabric and 3.13 for the print cloth. There was greater UVA (320-400 nm) than UVB (280-320 nm) transmission through these fabrics. After 5 washings with water alone and with detergent alone, UPF increased by 51% and 17%, respectively, for the cotton T-shirt fabric. Washing the T-shirt fabrics with detergent plus the UV-absorbing agent increased the UPF by 407% after 5 treatments. Dyeing the fabric blue or yellow increased the UPF by 544% and 212%, respectively. Similar changes in UPFs were observed for the print cloth fabric. Conclusion The two cotton fab…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mjd.2001.112384

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain colors, such as blue and black, can enhance UV protection.

    “Certain colors, such as blue and black, can enhance UV protection (12,20).”
  • UPFs of cotton fabric used for manufacturing summer T-shirts increased by more than 400% with the addition of UV absorber.

    “Wang et al. (20) showed that UPFs of cotton fabric used for manufacturing summer T-shirts increased by more than 400% with the addition of UV absorber.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S. Q., Kopf, A. W., Marx, J., Bogdan, A., Polsky, D., & Bart, R. S.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
767-774
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158478993
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (5P30 CA-16087, P30CA016087)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
Keywords
UV protection factor, cotton t-shirts, UV transmission, laundering, detergents, UV absorbers, textile dyeing, mercerized cotton, protective clothing, fabric shrinkage
MeSH terms
Gossypium, Detergents, Coloring Agents, Humans, Protective Clothing, Sunburn, Ultraviolet Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review