Cited by 112Frailty in Older AdultsChronic Disease Management StrategiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Screening for frailty in Canada’s health care system: A time for action

Open access
Muscedere, John, Andrew, Melissa K., Bagshaw, Sean M., Estabrooks, Carole, Hogan, David, Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna, Howlett, Susan, Lahey, William +8 more·2016·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ Avec le vieillissement de la population canadienne, la fragilité – avec son risque accru du déclin fonctionnel, la détérioration de la santé, et le décès – devient de plus en plus répandue. La physiologie de la fragilité reflète son origine parmi organes et systèmes multiples. Environ un quart des Canadiens qui sont âgés de plus de 65 sont fragiles, augmentant à plus de la moitié de ceux âgés de plus de 85. Notre système de soins de santé est organisé pour gérer les systèmes mono-organes, ce qui nuit à notre capacité à traiter efficacement les personnes atteintes de troubles multiples et des limitations fonctionnelles. Pour faire face à la fragilité, il faut reconnaître quand elle se produit, accroître la sensibilisation à son importance, développer des modèles holistiques pour ses soins, et générer des meilleures preuves pour son traitement. La reconnaissance de la façon dont la fragilité impacte la durée de vie permettrait l’intégration des objectifs en matière de soins dans les options de traitement. Les différents organisations de soins responsables variées dans le système de soins de santé canadien nécessiteront des stratégies et outils différentes pour évaluer la fragilité. Les changements dans la politique sera essentiels, étant donné la portée et la complexité des défis que pose la fragilité au système de soins de santé comme cela est organisé actuellement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980816000301

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes.

    “Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes (37–42).”

    From Telephone-based group mental health support for older adults in central Canada: pilot acceptability and effectiveness findings of The CONNECT Program (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 167 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Alon-Shenker , P . ( 2012 ). The unequal right to equality: Towards a dignifi ed lives approach to age discrimina- tion . The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence , 25 ( 2 ), 243 -282 .
  2. Clegg , A. , Rogers , L. , & Young , J . ( 2015 ). Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980816000301 Published online by Cambridge University Press Canadian Journal on Aging 35 (3)
  3. John Muscedere et al. community-dwelling older people: A systematic review . Age and Ageing , 44 ( 1 ), 148 -152 .
  4. Conference Board of Canada ( 2013 ). Future care for Canadian seniors-Why it matters . Ottawa, ON : Author .
  5. Mallery , L. H. , & Moorhouse , P . ( 2011 ). Respecting frailty . Journal of Medical Ethics , 37 ( 2 ), 126 -128 .
  6. McNally , M. E. , & Lahey , W . ( 2014 ). Frailty's place in ethics and law: Some thoughts on equality, autonomy and limits and possibilities for ageing citizens . In K. Rockwood & O. Theou (Eds.), Frailty in ageing: Biological, clinical and social implications (pp. 174 -185 ). Halifax, NS : Karger Medical and Scientifi c Publishers .
  7. Rennick , D. M. , & Fort , M. M . ( 2000 ). Lessons from genet- ically engineered animal models. XII. IL-10-defi cient (IL-10(-/-) mice and intestinal infl ammation . American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiol- ogy , 278 ( 6 ), G829 -G833 .
  8. Rockwood , K. , Silvius , J. L. , & Fox , R. A . ( 1998 ). Comprehen- sive geriatric assessment. Helping your elderly patients maintain functional well-being . Postgraduate Medicine , 103 ( 3 ), 247 -249 .
  9. Zaslavsky , O. , Cochrane , B. B. , Thompson , H. J. , Woods , N. F. , Herting , J. R. , & LaCroix , A . ( 2013 ). Frailty: A review of the fi rst decade of research . Biological Research for Nurs- ing , 15 ( 4 ), 422 -432 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muscedere, J., Andrew, M. K., Bagshaw, S. M., Estabrooks, C., Hogan, D., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Howlett, S., Lahey, W., Maxwell, C., McNally, M., Moorhouse, P., Rockwood, K., Rolfson, D., Sinha, S., Tholl, B., & for the Canadian Frailty Network (CFN)
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • HealthCareCAN (CA)
Corresponding author
Muscedere, John
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
281-297
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2406639032
Cited by
112
References
167
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
frailty, frailty screening, Canadian health care system, population aging, functional decline, multimorbidity, holistic care, health policy, health care organization, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Critical Care, Delivery of Health Care, Health Policy, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Mass Screening, Nursing Homes, Primary Health Care, Frail Elderly, Assisted Living Facilities, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review