Parents, peer groups, and other socializing influences.
Abstract
Three propositions that are central to J. R. Harris's group socialization theory (1995, 1998) are considered in this review. These propositions are as follows: (a) Parental behaviors have no long-term effects on children's psychological characteristics, (b) peer groups are the primary environmental influence on psychological functioning, and (c) dyadic relationships are situation-specific and do not generalize. The evidence that J. R. Harris has outlined in support of each of these propositions is reviewed, as is additional empirical research not considered by J. R. Harris. Serious limitations to each proposition are identified. The available evidence is more consistent with a model of multiple socialization agents. An expanded research agenda that permits a more definitive test of J. R. Harris's propositions and social relationship theory is proposed.
Cites (13)
- The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and DesignBronfenbrenner, Urie · 1979 · Harvard University Press eBooks
- A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structureMischel, Walter, Shoda, Yuichi · 1995 · Psychological Review
- How People Make Their Own Environments: A Theory of Genotype Environment EffectsScarr, Sandra, McCartney, Kathleen · 1983 · Child Development
- Peer Interactions, Relationships, and GroupsRubin, Kenneth H., Bukowski, William M., Parker, Jeffrey G. · 2007 · Handbook of Child Psychology
- Experiments in Intergroup DiscriminationTajfel, Henri · 1970 · Scientific American
- Social Cognitive TheoryBandura, Albert · 2008 · The International Encyclopedia of Communication
- Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development.Harris, Judith Rich · 1995 · Psychological Review
- Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers.Wentzel, Kathryn R. · 1998 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurtureCollins, W. Andrew, Maccoby, Eleanor E., Steinberg, Laurence, Hetherington, E. Mavis, Bornstein, Marc H. · 2000 · American Psychologist
- Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review.Newcomb, Andrew F., Bagwell, Catherine L. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (6)
- The New Look of Behavioral Genetics in Developmental Psychopathology: Gene-Environment Interplay in Antisocial Behaviors.Moffitt, Terrie E. · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
- Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation.Downey, Douglas B. · 2001 · American Psychologist
- Antecedents and Consequences of Risky Credit Behavior among College Students: Application and Extension of the Theory of Planned BehaviorXiao, Jing Jian, Tang, Chuanyi, Serido, Joyce, Shim, Soyeon · 2011 · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
- Why are Children in the Same Family So Different? Nonshared Environment a Decade LaterPlomin, Robert, Asbury, Kathryn, Dunn, Judith · 2001 · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Do children's attention processes mediate the link between family predictors and school readiness?NICHD Early Child Care Research Network · 2003 · Developmental Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parents, peer groups, and other socializing influences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0012-1649.36.6.699
- The paper
- Vandell, D. L. (2000). Parents, peer groups, and other socializing influences. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.6.699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.