A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint.

Laessle, Reinhold G., Tuschl, Reinhard J., Kotthaus, Britta C., Prike, Karl M.·1989·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

The construct validity of Herman and Polivy's Restraint Scale (RS), the restraint factor of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R), and the restraint scale of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ-R) were investigated by relating these scales to self-reported mean caloric intake per day and to other measures associated with disordered eating and figure consciousness. A factor analysis showed that the three restraint scales measure different components of the restraint construct. A high score on the RS was closely related to consequences of mostly unsuccessful dieting, such as disinhibited eating and weight fluctuations, but not to successful overall caloric restriction in everyday life. High scores on the TFEQ-R and the DEBQ-R represented the more successful dieting behavior component of restraint. The three scales have in common a motivational component of restrained eating, including concerns about shape and weight, and desire for thinness.

Cites (3)

  1. An Index of Factorial Simplicity
    Kaiser, Henry F. · 1974 · Psychometrika
  2. Construct validity in psychological tests.
    Cronbach, Lee J., Meehl, Paul E. · 1955 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
    Stunkard, Albert J., Messick, Samuel · 1985 · Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Show all 3 references

Cited by (28)

  1. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study
    Karlsson, J, Persson, L-O, Sjöström, L, Sullivan, M · 2000 · International Journal of Obesity
  2. A prospective test of the dual pathway model of bulimic pathology: mediating effects of dieting and negative affect
    Stice, Eric · 2001 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  3. Psychological and Behavioral Risk Factors for Obesity Onset in Adolescent Girls: A Prospective Study.
    Stice, Eric, Presnell, Katherine, Shaw, Heather, Rohde, Paul · 2005 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  4. Relations between negative affect, coping, and emotional eating.
    Spoor, Sonja T.P., Bekker, Marrie H.J., Van Strien, Tatjana, van Heck, Guus L. · 2007 · Appetite
  5. Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of acute dietary restriction? Unobtrusive observational data suggest not
    Stice, Eric, Fisher, Melissa, Lowe, Michael R. · 2004 · Psychological Assessment

See all 371

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-843x.98.4.504
The paper
Laessle, R. G., Tuschl, R. J., Kotthaus, B. C., & Prike, K. M. (1989). A comparison of the validity of three scales for the assessment of dietary restraint. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.98.4.504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.