Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.

Abstract

Response bias continues to be the most frequently cited criticism of personality testing for personnel selection. The authors meta-analyzed the social desirability literature, examining whether social desirability functions as a predictor for a variety of criteria, as a suppressor, or as a mediator. Social desirability scales were found not to predict school success, task performance, counterproductive behaviors, and job performance. Correlations with the Big Five personality dimensions, cognitive ability, and years of education are presented along with empirical evidence that (a) social desirability is not as pervasive a problem as has been anticipated by industrial-organizational psychologists, (b) social desirability is in fact related to real individual differences in emotional stability and conscientiousness, and (c) social desirability does not function as a predictor, as a practically useful suppressor, or as a mediator variable for the criterion of job performance. Removing the effects of social desirability from the Big Five dimensions of personality leaves the criterion-related validity of personality constructs for predicting job performance intact.

Cites (12)

1. The satisfaction with life scale
   Diener, Ed, Emmons, Robert A., Larsen, Randy J., Griffin, Sharon · 1985 · Journal of Personality Assessment
2. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
   Rosenthal, Robert · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
3. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
   BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
4. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
   Crowne, Douglas P., Marlowe, David · 1960 · Journal of Consulting Psychology
5. The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
   Sherer, Mark, Maddux, James E., Mercandante, Blaise, Prentice-Dunn, Steven, Jacobs, Beth, Rogers, Ronald W. · 1982 · Psychological Reports
6. Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
   Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
   Orwin, Robert G. · 1983 · Journal of Educational Statistics
8. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation
   Furnham, Adrian · 1986 · Personality and Individual Differences
9. THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
   VISWESVARAN, CHOCKALINGAM, ONES, DENIZ S. · 1995 · Personnel Psychology
10. Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 1996 · Psychological Methods

Show all 12 references

Cited by (42)

1. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
   Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., Patton, Gregory K. · 2001 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
   Spector, Paul E. · 2006 · Organizational Research Methods
3. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
   Judge, Timothy A., Bono, Joyce E., Ilies, Remus, Gerhardt, Megan W. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
4. WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
   CHRISTIAN, MICHAEL S., GARZA, ADELA S., SLAUGHTER, JEREL E. · 2011 · Personnel Psychology
5. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
   Poropat, Arthur E. · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 924