Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.

Cited by (42)

1. The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
   Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., Patton, Gregory K. · 2001 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
   Spector, Paul E. · 2006 · Organizational Research Methods
3. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
   Judge, Timothy A., Bono, Joyce E., Ilies, Remus, Gerhardt, Megan W. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
4. WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
   CHRISTIAN, MICHAEL S., GARZA, ADELA S., SLAUGHTER, JEREL E. · 2011 · Personnel Psychology
5. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
   Poropat, Arthur E. · 2009 · Psychological Bulletin
6. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?
   Barrick, Murray R., Mount, Michael K., Judge, Timothy A. · 2001 · International Journal of Selection and Assessment
7. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
   Judge, Timothy A., Heller, Daniel, Mount, Michael K. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
8. THE CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS SCALE: DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE
   JUDGE, TIMOTHY A., EREZ, AMIR, BONO, JOYCE E., THORESEN, CARL J. · 2003 · Personnel Psychology
9. Common method bias: It’ s bad, it’ s complex, it’ s widespread, and it’ s not easy to fix
   Podsakoff, Philip M., Podsakoff, Nathan P., Williams, Larry J., Huang, Chengquan, Yang, Junhui · 2024 · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
10. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being.
    Steel, Piers, Schmidt, Joseph, Shultz, Jonas · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
11. Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?
    Doty, D. Harold, Glick, William H. · 1998 · Organizational Research Methods
12. TRAIT AND BEHAVIORAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP: AN INTEGRATION AND META‐ANALYTIC TEST OF THEIR RELATIVE VALIDITY
    DERUE, D. SCOTT, NAHRGANG, JENNIFER D., WELLMAN, NED, HUMPHREY, STEPHEN E. · 2011 · Personnel Psychology
13. An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
    Connelly, Brian S., Ones, Deniz S. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
14. A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and Job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects
    GILBOA, SIMONA, SHIROM, ARIE, FRIED, YITZHAK, COOPER, CARY · 2008 · Personnel Psychology
15. Untitled work
    2007
16. Egoistic and Moralistic Biases in Self‐Perception: The Interplay of Self‐Deceptive Styles With Basic Traits and Motives
    Paulhus, Delroy L., John, Oliver P. · 1998 · Journal of Personality
17. Career adaptability: a meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results
    Rudolph, Cort W., Lavigne, Kristi N., Zacher, Hannes · 2017 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
18. Untitled work
    2002
19. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS
    MORGESON, FREDERICK P., CAMPION, MICHAEL A., DIPBOYE, ROBERT L., HOLLENBECK, JOHN R., MURPHY, KEVIN, SCHMITT, NEAL · 2007 · Personnel Psychology
20. Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research
    Paulhus, Delroy L., Robins, Richard W., Trzesniewski, Kali H., Tracy, Jessica L. · 2004 · Multivariate Behavioral Research
21. Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta analysis
    Higgins, Chad A., Judge, Timothy A., Ferris, Gerald R. · 2003 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
22. Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings
    SAROGLOU, VASSILIS, PICHON, ISABELLE, TROMPETTE, LAURENCE, VERSCHUEREN, MARIJKE, DERNELLE, REBECCA · 2005 · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
23. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
    McFarland, Lynn A., Ryan, Ann Marie · 2000 · Journal of Applied Psychology
24. Rethinking Social Desirability Scales: From Impression Management to Interpersonally Oriented Self-Control
    Uziel, Liad · 2010 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
25. Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures
    Salgado, Jesús F. · 2003 · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
26. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
    McGrath, Robert E., Mitchell, Matthew, Kim, Brian H., Hough, Leaetta · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
27. Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
    Christiansen, Neil D., Burns, Gary N., Montgomery, George E. · 2005 · Human Performance
28. Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior
    Griffith, Richard L., Chmielowski, Tom, Yoshita, Yukiko · 2007 · Personnel Review
29. Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes
    Egan, Vincent, Hughes, Natalie, Palmer, Emma J. · 2015 · Personality and Individual Differences
30. The Impact of Faking on Employment Tests: Does Forced Choice Offer a Solution?
    Jackson, Douglas N., Wroblewski, Victor R., Ashton, Michael C. · 2000 · Human Performance
31. Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: Indirect measurement and test faking.
    LeBreton, James M., Barksdale, Cheryl D., Robin, Jennifer, James, Lawrence R. · 2007 · Journal of Applied Psychology
32. Apples and oranges (and pears, oh my!): the search for moderators in meta-analysis
    Cortina, Jose M. · 2003 · Organizational Research Methods
33. The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis
    Salgado, Jesús F., Anderson, Neil, Tauriz, Gabriel · 2015 · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
34. Applicant Faking, Social Desirability, and the Prediction of Counterproductive Work Behaviors
    Peterson, Mitchell H., Griffith, Richard L., Isaacson, Joshua A., O'Connell, Matthew S., Mangos, Phillip M. · 2011 · Human Performance
35. Comparing personality test formats and warnings: Effects on criterion-related validity and test-taker reactions
    Converse, Patrick D., Oswald, Frederick L., Imus, Anna, Hedricks, Cynthia, Roy, Radha, Butera, Hilary · 2008 · International Journal of Selection and Assessment
36. Meta-analytic five-factor model personality intercorrelations: Eeny, meeny, miney, moe, how, which, why, and where to go.
    Park, HyeSoo (Hailey), Wiernik, Brenton M., Oh, In-Sue, Gonzalez-Mulé, Erik, Ones, Deniz S., Lee, Youngduk · 2020 · Journal of Applied Psychology
37. The consequences of personality biases in online panels for measuring public opinion
    Valentino, Nicholas A., Zhirkov, Kirill, Hillygus, D. Sunshine, Guay, Brian · 2021 · Public Opinion Quarterly
38. What is students' ideal university instructor personality? An investigation of absolute and relative personality preferences
    Kim, Lisa E., MacCann, Carolyn · 2016 · Personality and Individual Differences
39. The relationship between cognitive ability and personality scores in selection situations: A meta‐analysis
    Schilling, Michael, Becker, Nicolas, Grabenhorst, Magdalena M., König, Cornelius J. · 2021 · International Journal of Selection and Assessment
40. Using overt and covert items in self-report personality tests: susceptibility to faking and identifiability of possible fakers.
    Vidotto, Giulio, Anselmi, Pasquale, Filipponi, Luca, Tommasi, Marco, Saggino, Aristide · 2018 · Frontiers in Psychology
41. Quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories and the control of faking: The biasing effects of transient error
    Martínez, Alexandra, Salgado, Jesús F., Lado, Mario · 2022 · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
42. Supplemental Material for Does Response Distortion Statistically Affect the Relations Between Self-Report Psychopathy Measures and External Criteria?
    2016 · Psychological Assessment