Innovation in top management teams.
Abstract
A longitudinal study of the functioning of top management teams in 27 hospitals examined relationships between group and organizational factors and team innovation. A model of group inputs, processes, and outputs was used, and it was predicted that group size, resources, team tenure, group processes, and proportion of innovative team members would affect the level and quality of team innovation. The results suggested that group processes best predict the overall level of team innovation, whereas the proportion of innovative team members predicts the rated radicalness of innovations introduced. Resources available to teams do not predict overall team innovation. The quality of team innovation (radicalness, magnitude, and novelty) may be determined primarily by the composition of the team, but overall level of innovation may be more a consequence of the team's characteristic social processes.
Cites (7)
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response biasJames, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.Amabile, Teresa M. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Toward a theory of task motivation and incentivesLocke, Edwin A. · 1968 · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
- A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations.Latham, G. P., Yukl, G. A. · 1975 · Academy of Management Journal
- A disagreement about within-group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensusKozlowski, Steve W., Hattrup, Keith · 1992 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations.Siegel, Saul M., Kaemmerer, William F. · 1978 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Developing a process model of problem recognitionCowan, David A. · 1986 · The Academy of Management Review
Cited by (23)
- Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding FrameworkAnderson, Neil, Potočnik, Kristina, Zhou, Jing · 2014 · Journal of Management
- Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Weingart, Laurie R. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers1Damanpour, Fariborz, Schneider, Marguerite · 2006 · British Journal of Management
- From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journeyPerry-Smith, Jill E., Mannucci, Pier Vittorio · 2017 · Academy of Management Review
- The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐scienceAnderson, Neil, De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A. · 2004 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovation in top management teams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.81.6.680
- The paper
- West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.81.6.680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.