The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First lapses to smoking: Within-subjects analysis of real-time reports.
Abstract
Studies of smoking relapse and temptation episodes have relied on retrospective recall and confounded between- and within-subject variability. Real-time data on temptations and lapses to smoke were gathered using palm-top computers. We made within-subject comparisons of the initial lapse, a temptation episode, and base rate data obtained through randomly scheduled assessments. Negative affect discriminated all three situations, with lapses worse than temptations, and temptations worse than random situations. Participants attributed lapses to negative mood and smoking cues, whereas temptations were more often attributed to behavioral transitions. Participants were 12 times more likely to report coping in temptations than in lapses. However, only cognitive (vs. behavioral) coping strategies were effective. Lapses (vs. the other situations) were more likely to occur when smoking was permitted, when cigarettes were easily available, and in the presence of other smokers. The results have clinical implications, and the computerized monitoring methods may be applicable to an array of clinical research problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Psychiatric difficulty and negative affect have also shown to predict poor outcomes”
From Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) (2013) · cites this paper as Schiffman, Paty, Gnys, Kassel, & Kickcox, 1996
In the citing paper
“Exposure to risky situations and severity of craving have has been implicated in relapse”
From Development and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) (2013) · cites this paper as Schiffman et al., 1996
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 · Cited by 2,544
Predicting Smoking Cessation: Who Will Quit With and Without the Nicotine Patch
Kenford, S. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.271.8.589 · Cited by 405
Cohen, S., Lichtenstein, E., Prochaska, J. O., Rossi, J. S., Gritz, E. R., Carr, C. R., Orleans, C. T., Schoenbach, V. J., Biener, L., Abrams, D., et al. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.11.1355 · Cited by 315
Can induced moods trigger drug-related responses in opiate abuse patients?
Childress, A. R., Ehrman, R., McLellan, A. T., MacRae, J., Natale, M., & O'Brien, C. P. (1994) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/0740-5472(94)90060-4 · Cited by 171
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Self-citationAddiction motivation reformulated: an affective processing model of negative reinforcement
Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R., & Fiore, M. C. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.33 · Cited by 2,162
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C., Campbell, F., Pienaar, E. D., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J. B., Saunders, J. B., & Burnand, B. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4 · Cited by 1,665
The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings
Shaham, Y., Shalev, U., Lu, L., de Wit, H., & Stewart, J. (2003) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1224-x · Cited by 1,615
Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture: The Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire.
Kavanagh, D. J., Andrade, J., & May, J. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.2.446 · Cited by 956
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiffman, S., Paty, J. A., Gnys, M., Kassel, J. A., & Hickcox, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 366-379
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W1978691251
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 06084, R01DA006084)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- smoking relapse, smoking lapse, negative affect, coping strategies, cognitive coping, smoking cues, social influences on smoking, computer monitoring, within-person variability, smoking cessation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Smoking Cessation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
