Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments.

Lundeberg, Mary A., Fox, Paul W., Punccohar, Judith·1994·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Although gender differences are fairly consistent when people report their general confidence, much less is known about such differences when individuals assess the degree of confidence they have in their ability to answer any particular test question. The objective of this research was to investigate gender differences in item-specific confidence judgments. Data were collected from three psychology courses containing 70 men and 181 women. After answering each item on course exams, students indicated their confidence that their answer to that item was correct. Results showed that gender differences in confidence are dependent on the context (whether items were correct or wrong) and on the domain being tested. Moreover, although both men and women were overconfident, undergraduate men are especially overconfident when incorrect.

Cites (19)

  1. Rank Correlation Methods.
    Moran, P. A. P., Kendall, M. G. · 1951 · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)
  2. Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
    Hyde, Janet S., Fennema, Elizabeth, Lamon, Susan J. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Rank Correlation Methods
    Govindarajulu, Z., Kendall, M., Gibbons, J. D. · 1992 · Technometrics
  4. The Psychology of Gender: Advances through Meta-Analysis
    Halpern, Diane F., Hyde, Janet Shibley, Linn, Marcia C. · 1989 · The American Journal of Psychology
  5. Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis
    Hyde, Janet Shibley, Fennema, Elizabeth, Ryan, Marilyn, Frost, Laurie A., Hopp, Carolyn · 1990 · Psychology of Women Quarterly
  6. Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study
    Fennema, Elizabeth H., Sherman, Julia A. · 1978 · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  7. The Imposter Phenomenon: An Internal Barrier to Empowerment and Achievement
    Clance, Pauline Rose, OToole, Maureen Ann · 1987 · Women & Therapy
  8. Inexpert calibration of comprehension
    Glenberg, Arthur M., Epstein, William · 1987 · Memory & Cognition
  9. Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings.
    Roberts, Tomi-Ann · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
  10. Metacomprehension of text material.
    Ruth Hipple Maki, Sharon Lee Berry · 1984 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Show all 19 references

Cited by (18)

  1. Gender Differences in Preferences
    Croson, Rachel, Gneezy, Uri · 2009 · Journal of Economic Literature
  2. Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment
    Barber, B. M., Odean, T. · 2001 · The Quarterly Journal of Economics
  3. Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior1
    Venkatesh, Viswanath, Morris, Michael G. · 2000 · MIS Quarterly
  4. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing
    2001 · The Journal of Finance
  5. Performance in competitive environments: gender differences
    Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., Rustichini, A. · 2003 · The Quarterly Journal of Economics

See all 678

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.86.1.114
The paper
Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Punccohar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.86.1.114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.