When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons.
Abstract
In a series of 3 experiments, college students who read a summary that contained a sequence of short captions with simple illustrations depicting the main steps in the process of lightning recalled these steps and solved transfer problems as well as or better than students who received the full text along with the summary or the full text alone. In Experiment 2, taking away the illustrations or the captions eliminated the effectiveness of the summary. In Experiment 3, adding text to the summary reduced its effectiveness. Implications for a cognitive theory of multimedia learning are discussed; implications for instructional design pertain to the need for conciseness, coherence, and coordination in presenting scientific explanations. Consider the following scenario. A student who is inexperienced in meteorology reads a textbook lesson explaining the cause-and-effect chain of events involved in how lightning storms develop. The explanation is clearly contained within the 600 words and five illustrations of the lesson. A few minutes later, we ask the student to write down the explanation (as a retention test) and to solve some problems that require using the explanation from the lesson (as a transfer test). For example, as a transfer problem, we ask the student to write an explanation for why there can be clouds in the sky but no lightning. Despite exerting considerable effort, the student performs poorly on both the retention and the transfer task, indicating a lack of understanding of the process of lightning.
Cites (4)
- When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?Mayer, Richard E., Gallini, Joan K. · 1990 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.Mayer, Richard E., Anderson, Richard B. · 1992 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis.Mayer, Richard E., Anderson, Richard B. · 1991 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- Learning as a generative process 1Wittrock, M. C. · 1974 · Educational Psychologist
Cited by (26)
- Multimedia LearningMayer, Richard E. · 2009
- Multimedia LearningMayer, Richard · 2020
- Cognitive Architecture and Instructional DesignSweller, John, van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G., Paas, Fred G. W. C. · 1998 · Educational Psychology Review
- Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load TheoryPaas, Fred, Tuovinen, Juhani E., Tabbers, Huib, Van Gerven, Pascal W. M. · 2003 · Educational Psychologist
- Cognitive Theory of Multimedia LearningMayer, Richard E. · 2014 · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.64
- The paper
- Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.