Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis.
Abstract
This study examines how cognitive processes interrelate as well as predict learning-disabled (LD) readers' word recognition and reading comprehension performance. Correlations between phonological, orthographic, semantic, metacognitive, and working memory measures with reading performance were examined in LD and skilled readers ages 8 to 12 years. Important results were (a) LD readers were deficient on all cognitive processes compared with skilled readers, but these differences do not reflect IQ scores; (b) reading ability group differences emerged on a component composed primarily of working memory measures (referred to as g) as well as unique components, suggesting that these differences emerge on both general and specific (modular) processes; (c) g best predicts reading comprehension for both groups; and (d) phonological awareness best predicts skilled readers' pseudoword reading, whereas g best predicts LD readers' pseudoword performance. Overall, LD readers' information processing difficulties were described within a general working memory model that views such children as having difficulty accessing and coordinating both general and specific processes. Results suggest that the cognitive processes that contribute to reading deficits are best understood in the context of their combination with other operations rather than in isolation.
Cites (5)
- A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memoryJust, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- The Development of Hierarchical Factor SolutionsSchmid, John, Leiman, John M. · 1957 · Psychometrika
- The Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled ChildrenSiegel, Linda S., Ryan, Ellen B. · 1989 · Child Development
- Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities.Wagner, Richard K., Torgesen, Joseph K., Laughon, Pamela, Simmons, Karen, Rashotte, Carol A. · 1993 · Journal of Educational Psychology
Cited by (13)
- Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved PracticeHenson, Robin K., Roberts, J. Kyle · 2006 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memorySt Clair-Thompson, Helen L., Gathercole, Susan E. · 2006 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- The Relationship Between Working Memory and Mathematical Problem Solving in Children at Risk and Not at Risk for Serious Math Difficulties.Swanson, H. Lee, Beebe-Frankenberger, Margaret · 2004 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memoryPeng, Peng, Barnes, Marcia, Wang, CuiCui, Wang, Wei, Li, Shan, Swanson, H. Lee, Dardick, William, Tao, Sha · 2018 · Psychological Bulletin
- Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are importantSwanson, H.Lee, Sachse-Lee, Carole · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.128
- The paper
- Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. E. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.