Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting.

Tetlock, Philip E., Bernzweig, Jane, Gallant, Jack L.·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1227

Cites (1)

  1. Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data
    Sales, Stephen M. · 1973 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 1 references

Cited by (9)

  1. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
    Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., Sulloway, Frank J. · 2003 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
    Jost, John T. · 2017 · Political Psychology
  3. Attitudes and Attitude Change
    Chaiken, S, Stangor, C · 1987 · Annual Review of Psychology
  4. A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.
    Tetlock, Philip E. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Sexual Morality: The Cultures and Emotions of Conservatives and Liberals1
    Haidt, Jonathan, Hersh, Matthew A. · 2001 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology

See all 167

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1227
The paper
Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.48.5.1227

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.