The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Specifically, by building on Tetlock's (1986) value pluralism model, we predict and empirically demonstrate that decision-makers resolve representation-based dilemmas in task assignment decisions by prioritizing diversity because they believe that is what organizational leaders would want for them to do.”
From Included but undermined: How representation goals backfire (2025) · cites this paper as Tetlock's (1986)
Citations
Cites
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications
Schwartz, S. (2006) · Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1163/156913306778667357 · Cited by 2,150
The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0 · Cited by 891
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x · Cited by 588
Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions.
Peng, K., Nisbett, R. E., & Wong, N. Y. C. (1997) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.4.329 · Cited by 408
Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070102 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tetlock, P. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1986-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 819-827
- ISSN
- 1939-1315
- 0022-3514
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
