Cited by 360Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Social Influence

Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data

Sales, Stephen M.·1973·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Many investigators have proposed that threat is a basic cause of authoritarianism. This perspective suggests the hypothesis that increased threat should evoke increased authoritarianism. To test this prediction, various archival data from 2 threatening historical periods (the 1930's and 1967-1970) and 2 nonthreatening periods (the 1920's and 1959-1964) were examined to determine whether authoritarianism did increase in response to threat. Data indicate that environmental threat was reliably associated with changed behavior in most areas of the Results are consistent with the hypothesis that threat is a cause of authoritarianism and added validity to the concept of an authoritarian syndrome. (45 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0035588

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that the threat of famine predicts authoritarian governance in small-scale societies is convergent with psychological research showing that individual-level authoritarianism is generally higher during times of resource scarcity.

    “The finding that the threat of famine predicts authoritarian governance in small-scale societies is also convergent with psychological research showing that individual-level authoritarianism is generally higher during times of resource scarcity [42], [49].”
  • The results suggest that the prevalence of a disease-irrelevant threat-famine-may also uniquely encourage authoritarian political governance, consistent with past research linking other threats to authoritarianism.

    “These results also suggest that the prevalence of a disease-irrelevant threat—famine—may also uniquely encourage authoritarian political governance, which is consistent with past research that links other threats to authoritarianism [41], [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sales, S. M.
Corresponding author
Sales, Stephen M.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1973
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
44-57
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2008707618
Cited by
360
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 27
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
authoritarianism, threats, environmental hazards, authoritarian behavior, 1930s, 1920s, archival data
MeSH terms
Aggression, Attitude, Attitude to Health, Authoritarianism, Behavior, Caricatures as Topic, Fantasy, Female, Humans, Jurisprudence, Legislation as Topic, Male, Morals, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Publishing, Punishment, Religion and Psychology, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Social Conditions, Social Conformity, Social Environment, Superstitions, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review