The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Morality: The Cultures and Emotions of Conservatives and Liberals1
Abstract
Political conservatives and liberals were interviewed about 3 kinds of sexual acts: homosexual sex, unusual forms of masturbation, and consensual incest between an adult brother and sister. Conservatives were more likely to moralize and to condemn these acts, but the differences were concentrated in the homosexual scenarios and were minimal in the incest scenarios. Content analyses reveal that liberals had a narrow moral domain, largely limited to the “ethics of autonomy” (Shweder, Much, Mahapatra, & Park, 1997) while conservatives had a broader and more multifaceted moral domain. Regression analyses show that, for both groups, moral judgments were best predicted by affective reactions, and were not predicted by perceptions of harmfulness. Suggestions for calming the culture wars over homosexuality are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The emotion of disgust has been found especially relevant to prejudice toward lesbians and gay men.
“However, the emotion of disgust has been found especially relevant to prejudice toward lesbians and gay men (Haidt and Hersh, 2001; Inbar et al., 2009; Terrizzi et al., 2010).”
From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Haidt and Hersh, 2001
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Axelrod R., 1984, The evolution of cooperation
- Bellah R., 1985, Habits of the heart
- Cloud J., 1998, For better or worse, Time, 152, 43
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.202 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224498809551476 · DOI
- Hunter J. D., 1991, Culture wars: The struggle to define America
- 10.1007/s12108-998-1021-z · DOI
- 10.1159/000278737 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb02362.x · DOI
- Kohlberg L., 1969, Handbook of socialization theory and research, 347
- 10.1037/0022-3514.32.4.699 · DOI
- Lacayo R., 1998, The new gay struggle, Time, 152, 33
- McWilliams P., 1993, Ain't nobody's business if you do
- Michael R. T., 1994, Sex in America: A definitive survey
- Miller J., 1990, Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 33, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.33 · DOI
- 10.1525/eth.1994.22.2.02a00020 · DOI
- Posner R. A., 1996, A guide to America's sex laws
- Rozin P., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 637
- Schwarz N., 1996, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 433
- 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T · DOI
- 10.1177/1354067X9511008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00582.x · DOI
- Shweder R. A., 1997, Morality and health, 119
- Smith M. B., 1956, Opinions and personality
- 10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.737 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.115 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1227 · DOI
- Turiel E., 1983, The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention
- 10.2307/1166056 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Self-citationGraham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021847 · Cited by 2,666
Self-citationWhen Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationDisgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism.
Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014823 · Cited by 1,120
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Self-citationStrohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005 · Cited by 596
Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611429024 · Cited by 358
Self-citationHorberg, E. J., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073911402384 · Cited by 339
Moral hypervigilance: The influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain
Jones, A., & Fitness, J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0013435 · Cited by 203
Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations
Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x · Cited by 179
Deontological and altruistic guilt: evidence for distinct neurobiological substrates
Basile, B., Mancini, F., Macaluso, E., Caltagirone, C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Bozzali, M. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21009 · Cited by 133
Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Cohen, G. L., Gastil, J., & Slovic, P. (2010) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9201-0 · Cited by 99
Sauer, H. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108529181 · Cited by 72
Collision with China: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis, Somatic Marking, and the EP-3 Incident
SLINGERLAND, E., BLANCHARD, E. M., & BOYD-JUDSON, L. (2007) · International studies quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00439.x · Cited by 29
The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment
Haidt, J. (2008) · Reasoning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814273.055 · Cited by 27
Self-citationMoral Reactions to Sexual Relationships that Violate Age Norms
Felson, R. B., & Silver, E. (2024) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2023.2192196 · Cited by 3
“Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia
Baider, F., & Mesaritou, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1748828
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-221
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2132553791
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- sexual morality, moral judgment, homosexuality, incest, masturbation, moral domain, ethics of autonomy, affective reactions, culture wars, moral emotions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review