Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking.

Strack, Fritz, Schwarz, Norbert, Gschneidinger, Elisabeth·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three experiments showed that subjects' ratings of general life satisfaction depended not only on the hedonic quality of the life experiences they happened to recall but also on the way in which they thought about them. Specifically, the hedonic quality of present life events influenced subjects' judgments of well-being in the same direction. The hedonic quality of past events, however, had a congruent impact on well-being judgments only when thinking about them elicited affect in the present but otherwise had a contrast effect on these judgments. Two factors were found to determine if thinking about the past elicits affect: whether subjects describe the events vividly and in detail or only mention them briefly, and whether subjects describe how the events occurred rather than why they occurred. Possible mediating mechanisms and implications of these results are discussed. People's feelings of happiness and satisfaction are no doubt a function of the affective quality of their everyday experiences. The nature of this relation, however, is not as straightforward as one might expect. For example, whereas negative experiences do frequently decrease individuals' perceptions of their quality of life (e.g., Zautra & Reich, 1983), some findings indicate that negative events may also increase subjective well-being (Elder, 1974). In fact, even events of extreme hedonic value seem to be poor predictors of individuals' wellbeing. For example, Brickman, Coates, and Janoff-Bulman (1978) found in their study that people who won a million dollars in a lottery

Cites (3)

  1. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.
    Schwarz, Norbert, Clore, Gerald L. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery
    Lang, Peter J. · 1979 · Psychophysiology
  3. Evaluative judgments of aspects of life as a function of vicarious exposure to hedonic extremes
    Dermer, Marshall, Cohen, Sidney J., Jacobsen, Elaine, Anderson, Erling A. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 3 references

Cited by (58)

  1. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
    Forgas, Joseph P. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.
    Keyes, Corey L. M., Shmotkin, Dov, Ryff, Carol D. · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
    Schwarz, Norbert · 1999 · American Psychologist
  4. Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior
    Loewenstein, George · 1996 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  5. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events – the mobilization minimization hypothesis.
    Taylor, Shelley E. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 610

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1460
The paper
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., & Gschneidinger, E. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.