Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect.

Abstract

Two studies examined whether the type of emotional change experienced by individuals is influenced by the magnitude and accessibility of the different types of self-discrepancies they possess. In both studies, subjects filled out a measure of self-discrepancy a few weeks prior to the experimental session. Subjects were asked to list up to 10 attributes each for different self-states--their actual self, their ideal self (their own or others' hopes and goals for them), and their ought self (their own or others' beliefs about their duty and obligations). Magnitude of self-discrepancy was calculated by comparing the attributes in the actual self to the attributes in either the ideal self or the ought self, with the total number of attribute pairs that matched being subtracted from the total number of attribute pairs that mismatched. In Study 1, subjects were asked to imagine either a positive event or a negative event and were then given a mood measure and a writing-speed task. Subjects with a predominant actual:ideal discrepancy felt more dejected (e.g., sad) and wrote more slowly in the negative event condition than in the positive event condition, whereas subjects with a predominant actual:ought discrepancy, if anything, felt more agitated (e.g., afraid) and wrote more quickly in the negative event condition. In Study 2, subjects were selected who were either high in both kinds of discrepancies or low in both. Half of the subjects in each group were asked to discuss their own and their parents' hopes and goals for them (ideal priming), and the other half were asked to discuss their own and their parents' beliefs concerning their duty and obligations (ought priming). For high-discrepancy subjects, but not low-discrepancy subjects, ideal priming increased their dejection whereas ought priming increased their agitation. The implications of these findings for identifying cognitive-motivational factors that may serve as vulnerability markers for emotional problems is discussed.

Cites (50)

1. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud
   Sigmund Freud · 1953
2. Childhood and Society
   Erik Homburger Erikson · 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
3. Mind, Self, and Society: The Definitive Edition
   Mead, George Herbert, Joas, Hans, Huebner, Daniel R., Morris, Charles W. · 2015 · University of Chicago Press eBooks
4. Social Theory and Social Structure
   Ross, Eva J., Merton, Robert K. · 1958 · The American Catholic Sociological Review
5. Cognitive Therapy for Depression: (675542012-001)
   2012 · PsycEXTRA Dataset
6. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS
   2010 · INQUIRING MAN:
7. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
   Kirk, Roger · 2013
8. Handbook of Social Psychology
   2013 · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research
9. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
   Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
10. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
    Higgins, E. Tory · 1987 · Psychological Review

Show all 50 references

Cited by (49)

1. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
   Higgins, E. Tory · 1987 · Psychological Review
2. The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory
   Stryker, Sheldon, Burke, Peter J. · 2000 · Social Psychology Quarterly
3. Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle
   Higgins, E. Tory · 1998 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
4. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development
   John, Oliver P., Gross, James J. · 2004 · Journal of Personality
5. Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making
   Crowe, Ellen, Higgins, E.Tory · 1997 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

See all 705