Cited by 1,990Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsBehavioral Health and InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making

Crowe, Ellen, Higgins, E.Tory·1997·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-02
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
117-132
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157464421
Cited by
1,990
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 190 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 75
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, framing effects, decision-making, omission errors, commission errors, task difficulty, failure, alternative generation, signal detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review