Cited by 854Categorization, perception, and languageSocial and Intergroup PsychologyLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language.

Open access
Semin, Gün R., Fiedler, Klaus·1988·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies examined the cognitive implications of linguistic categories in the interpersonal domain. On the basis of conceptual and linguistic criteria, we advance a four-level classification that distinguishes between verbs and adjectives in the interpersonal domain. These four levels (in terms of increasing abstractness) are descriptive action verbs, interpretive action verbs, state verbs, and adjectives. Results from the first two studies reveal a systematic relation between the respective linguistic category and the temporal stability of the quality expressed in the sentence, the sentence's infonnativeness about the subject, the sentence's verinability and disputability, and the sentence's informativeness about a specific situation. Results from the last study support the four-level linguistic classification and its differential cognitive functions. Implications for social cognition and personality research are discussed. In the three studies reported in this article, we examine the cognitive functions of different linguistic categories used to describe persons and their behaviors. The aim is to elucidate how language mediates between social cognition and social reality. The interface between language and social cognition remains a relatively neglected issue in the burgeoning field of social cogni

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 854

Metadata

Authors
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1988-04
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
558-568
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1987865451
Cited by
854
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 40
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
linguistic categories, social cognition, language and cognition, action verbs, adjectives, state verbs, temporal stability, informativeness, veridicality, personality description, language and social reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review