Cited by 615Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution

Hewstone, Miles·1990·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Studies that examine causal attributions for acts by ingroup and outgroup members are reviewed. The tendency for attributions to favour ingroup over outgroup members is found in three paradigms — explanations for positive and negative outcomes, success and failure, and group differences — and in most of the 19 studies reviewed, but the evidence provides only limited support for Pettigrew's (1979) ‘ultimate attribution error’. The evidence is limited to specific dimensions in a given study, but strongest for three general findings: (1) More internal attribution for positive acts, and less internal attribution for negative acts, by ingroup than outgroup members; (2) More attribution of outgroup than ingroup failure to lack of ability, and ‘explaining away’ outgroup success to good luck, high effort or an easy task; (3) A preference for ingroup‐serving versus outgroup‐serving attributions for group differences. Finally, theoretical issues and methodological shortcomings are discussed with reference to future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.2420200404

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, people retain information in a more detailed fashion, remember more positive information, and are more forgiving of behaviors for ingroup compared to outgroup members.

    “In general, people retain information in a more detailed fashion, remember more positive information, and are more forgiving of behaviors for ingroup compared to outgroup members.102–104”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hewstone, M.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Hewstone, Miles
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
311-335
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W1993847277
Cited by
615
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
causal attribution, intergroup relations, in-group favoritism, outgroup favoritism, internal attribution, explaining away, attribution of success and failure, group differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review