Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features.

Charles Stangor, Laure Lynch, Changming Duan, Beth Glas·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Five experiments used a name-matching paradigm developed by Taylor et al (1978) to investigate how people use the immediately apparent features of others as a basis of social categorization. Ss were more likely to categorize targets according to their sex than their race but also tended to categorize using a single subordinate category that represented sex and race simultaneously.

Cites (34)

  1. Untitled work
    1954
  2. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
    Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Principles of Categorization
    2002 · Foundations of Cognitive Psychology
  4. A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation
    Fiske, Susan T., Neuberg, Steven L. · 1990 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  5. Cognition and Categorization
    Rosch, Eleanor, Lloyd, Barbara B. · 2024 · Routledge eBooks
  6. Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.
    Susan T. Fiske · 1980 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  7. A dual process model of impression formation.
    Marilynn B. Brewer · 1988
  8. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior
    2015 · Psychology Press eBooks
  9. Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect.
    Christine Hansen, Ranald D. Hansen · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  10. Toward an ecological theory of social perception.
    McArthur, Leslie Z., Baron, Reuben M. · 1983 · Psychological Review

Show all 34 references

Cited by (36)

  1. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
    Eagly, Alice H., Karau, Steven J. · 2002 · Psychological Review
  2. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
    Glick, Peter, Fiske, Susan T. · 1996 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.
    van Knippenberg, Daan, De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Homan, Astrid C. · 2004 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes
    Ely, Robin J., Thomas, David A. · 2001 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  5. Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
    Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Correll, Shelley J. · 2004 · Gender & Society

See all 707

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.207
The paper
Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glas, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.