When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity.

Abstract

Two experiments examined whether interpersonal complementarity or similarity influences people's satisfaction with dyadic interactions. Participants in complementary partnerships (submissive people with dominant partners, dominant people with submissive partners) reported more satisfaction than did those with similar partners. In Study 1 complementarity referred to the match between, the participants' self-reported interpersonal style (dominant or submissive) and the role enacted by a confederate (dominant or submissive). In Study 2 participants interacted in pairs, and complementarity referred to the match between one participant's interpersonal goals and the other's overt behavior. Participants whose goals were complemented by their partners' behavior were more satisfied with the interaction than those whose goals were not. In both studies satisfied participants perceived their partners as similar to themselves. Over the years a number of interpersonal theories have emerged to describe the relationship between two people in an

Cites (67)

1. Untitled work
   1969
2. The measurement of psychological androgyny
   Bem, Sandra L. · 1974 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
3. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model.
   Bartholomew, Kim, Horowitz, Leonard M. · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry
   2013 · Routledge eBooks
5. Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
   Lawrence A. Pervin · 1992
6. The attraction paradigm
   1972 · Behavior Therapy
7. Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality
   Timothy Leary · 1957
8. Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective
   Bartholomew, Kim · 1990 · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
9. Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
   Horowitz, Leonard M., Rosenberg, Saul E., Baer, Barbara A., Ureño, Gilbert, Villaseñor, Valerie S. · 1988 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
10. A psychological taxonomy of trait‐descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain
    Wiggins, Jerry S. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 67 references

Cited by (12)

1. Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science
   Finkel, Eli J., Eastwick, Paul W., Karney, Benjamin R., Reis, Harry T., Sprecher, Susan · 2012 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
2. Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior
   Tiedens, Larissa Z., Fragale, Alison R. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams
   Franke, Nikolaus, Gruber, Marc, Harhoff, Dietmar, Henkel, Joachim · 2006 · Journal of Business Venturing
4. When Conscientious Employees Meet Intelligent Machines: An Integrative Approach Inspired by Complementarity Theory and Role Theory
   Man Tang, Pok, Koopman, Joel, McClean, Shawn T., Zhang, Jack H., Li, Chi Hon, De Cremer, David, Lu, Yizhen, Ng, Chin Tung Stewart · 2022 · Academy of Management Journal
5. Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, Validity, and Applicability to Interpersonal Problems and Personality Disorders
   Locke, Kenneth D. · 2000 · Journal of Personality Assessment

See all 304