The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much of this research is based on field surveys of individuals with personal experience of being affected by decisions (e.g. [79]), although controlled experiments involving simulated decisionmaking and scenario-based methods have also been used [78].”
From 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018) · cites this paper as [78]
In the citing paper
“Research on justice judgements in non-automated contexts has found that individuals pay more attention to other people's outcomes than they do to information about the procedure behind the decision that affects them [78, 84].”
From 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice
Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791 · Cited by 1,524
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
Advances in Organizational Justice
Greenberg, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2001) · Cited by 1,416
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M.
- ORCID
- Lind, E. Allan
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1034-1046
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4243800640
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- perceived fairness, outcome measurement, social comparison, fairness judgments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
- The paper
- van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
