Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.
Abstract
Although a flurry of meta-analyses summarized the justice literature at the turn of the millennium, interest in the topic has surged in the decade since. In particular, the past decade has witnessed the rise of social exchange theory as the dominant lens for examining reactions to justice, and the emergence of affect as a complementary lens for understanding such reactions. The purpose of this meta-analytic review was to test direct, mediating, and moderating hypotheses that were inspired by those 2 perspectives, to gauge their adequacy as theoretical guides for justice research. Drawing on a review of 493 independent samples, our findings revealed a number of insights that were not included in prior meta-analyses. With respect to social exchange theory, our results revealed that the significant relationships between justice and both task performance and citizenship behavior were mediated by indicators of social exchange quality (trust, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and leader-member exchange), though such mediation was not apparent for counterproductive behavior. The strength of those relationships did not vary according to whether the focus of the justice matched the target of the performance behavior, contrary to popular assumptions in the literature, or according to whether justice was referenced to a specific event or a more general entity. With respect to affect, our results showed that justice-performance relationships were mediated by positive and negative affect, with the relevant affect dimension varying across justice and performance variables. Our discussion of these findings focuses on the merit in integrating the social exchange and affect lenses in future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent meta-analysis of 25 years of organizational justice research indicates that SET variables such as trust, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and leader-member exchange are important to relations among justice, task performance, and citizenship behavior.
“For example, a recent meta-analysis of 25 years of organizational justice research indicates that SET variables such as trust, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and leader-member exchange are important to relations among justice, task performance, and citizenship behavior (Colquitt et al., 2013).”
From The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant? (2018) · cites this paper as Colquitt et al., 2013
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · see citing works
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691 · see citing works
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001 · see citing works
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406 · see citing works
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346 · see citing works
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For its part, procedural justice is believed to convey status for reasons that go beyond outcomes, by signaling that individuals are valued members of the collectives to which they belong (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
BackgroundJustice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942 · see citing works
Self-citationHunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023 · see citing works
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 2× · see citing works
“When coding the justice dimensions, we generally relied on seminal definitions and measurement discussions (e.g., Adams, 1965; Bies & Moag, 1986; Colquitt, 2001; J. Greenberg, 1993a; Leventhal, 1976, 1980).”
BackgroundMethodA Relational Model of Authority in Groups
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x · Cited by 2,977 · see citing works
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606 · see citing works
Self-citationHumphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303 · see citing works
Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior.
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020858 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Kraimer, M. L., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.208 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Barsky, A., & Kaplan, S. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
The Benefits of Justice for Temporary Workers
Camerman, J., Cropanzano, R., & Vandenberghe, C. (2007) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601102287112 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Recovery from work-related effort: a meta-analysis
Bennett, A. A., Bakker, A. B., & Field, J. G. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2217 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038246 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2020) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12265 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2018.5 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Johnson, R. E., Lanaj, K., & Barnes, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035647 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., Koopman, J., & Passantino, L. G. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0455 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationThe nature of followership: Evolutionary analysis and review
Bastardoz, N., & Van Vugt, M. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.004 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L.-Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318823935 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Misati, E. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.013 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation
van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J. M., & Sedikides, C. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Construct Mixology: Forming New Management Constructs by Combining Old Ones
Newman, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Carpenter, N. C., & Rariden, S. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1161965 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Claudy, M. C., Aquino, K., & Graso, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898027 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The dynamism of daily justice: A person-environment fit perspective on the situated value of justice
Lennard, A. C., Matta, F. K., Lin, S.-H. (., Koopman, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1496 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Tian, X., Chae, H., Song, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17500-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“By introducing psychological safety as a mediator, this study adds psychological depth to UMT and responds to calls for more cognitively enriched perspectives 82 .”
- Authors
- Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- William & Mary (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-236
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2068405465
- Cited by
- 1,462
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 131 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 166.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Keywords
- organizational justice, social exchange theory, affect, task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, counterproductive behavior, trust, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, positive and negative affect, mediation, moderating effect
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychological Theory, Social Justice, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review