Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories.
Abstract
Five experiments supported the hypothesis that peoples' implicit theories about the fixedness versus malleability of human attributes (entity versus incremental theories) predict differences in degree of social stereotyping. Relative to those holding an incremental theory, people holding an entity theory made more stereotypical trait judgments of ethnic and occupational groups (Experiments 1, 2, and 5 ) and formed more extreme trait judgments of novel groups (Experiment 3 ). Implicit theories also predicted the degree to which people attributed stereotyped traits to inborn group qualities versus environmental forces (Experiment 2). Manipulating implicit theories affected level of stereotyping (Experiment 4), suggesting that implicit theories can play a causal role. Finally, implicit theories predicted unique and substantial variance in stereotype endorsement after controlling for the contributions of other stereotype-relevant individual difference variables (Experiment 5). These results highlight the importance of people's basic assumptions about personality in stereotyping.
Cites (8)
- A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Dweck, Carol S., Leggett, Ellen L. · 1988 · Psychological Review
- A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Crowne, Douglas P., Marlowe, David · 1960 · Journal of Consulting Psychology
- Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled componentsDevine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- “The Need for Cognition.”Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.Webster, Donna M., Kruglanski, Arie W. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound.Macrae, C. Neil, Bodenhausen, Galen V., Milne, Alan B., Jetten, Jolanda · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs.Weber, Reneé, Crocker, Jennifer · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (39)
- Intergroup BiasHewstone, Miles, Rubin, Mark, Willis, Hazel · 2002 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and PracticePaluck, Elizabeth Levy, Green, Donald P. · 2009 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Social Cognition: Thinking Categorically about OthersMacrae, C. Neil, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach.Hong, Ying-yi, Chiu, Chi-yue, Dweck, Carol S., Lin, Derrick M.-S., Wan, Wendy · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Mindsets: A View From Two ErasDweck, Carol S., Yeager, David S. · 2019 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1421
- The paper
- Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.