Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

Jennifer Wieselquist, Caryl E. Rusbult, Craig A. Foster, Christopher R. Agnew·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The present work advances and tests an interdependence-based model of the associations among commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust. Findings from two longitudinal studies revealed good support for model predictions. Commitment-inspired acts such as accommodation and willingness to sacrifice provide diagnostic information regarding a partner's pro-relationship motives. Individuals come to trust their partners when they perceive that their partners have enacted pro-relationship behaviors, departing from their direct self-interest for the good of the relationship. The results of mediation analyses are consistent with a model of mutual cyclical growth in which (a) dependence promotes strong commitment, (b) commitment promotes pro-relationship acts, (c) pro-relationship acts are perceived by the partner, (d) the perception of pro-relationship acts enhances the partner's trust, and (e) trust increases the partner's willingness to become dependent on the relationship. Auxiliary analyses revealed that self-reported attachment style does not account for substantial variance beyond the features of interdependence that form the basis for the present model.

Cites (3)

  1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
    Baron, Reuben M., Kenny, David A. · 1986 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Trust in close relationships.
    Rempel, John K., Holmes, John G., Zanna, Mark P. · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships.
    Agnew, Christopher R., Van Lange, Paul A. M., Rusbult, Caryl E., Langston, Christopher A. · 1998 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 3 references

Cited by (22)

  1. Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships
    Rusbult, Caryl E., Van Lange, Paul A. M. · 2003 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study
    Hawkley, L. C., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Masi, C. M., Thisted, R. A., Cacioppo, J. T. · 2008 · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
  3. Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis.
    Balliet, Daniel, Van Lange, Paul A. M. · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. The Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART‐Q): development and initial validation
    Jowett, Sophia, Ntoumanis, Nikos · 2004 · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
  5. Transactive goal dynamics.
    Fitzsimons, Gráinne M., Finkel, Eli J., vanDellen, Michelle R. · 2015 · Psychological Review

See all 750

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942
The paper
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.