Cited by 666Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study

Open access
Hawkley, L. C., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Masi, C. M., Thisted, R. A., Cacioppo, J. T.·2008·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test a conceptual model of loneliness in which social structural factors are posited to operate through proximal factors to influence perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness. METHODS: We used a population-based sample of 225 White, Black, and Hispanic men and women aged 50 through 68 from the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study to examine the extent to which associations between sociodemographic factors and loneliness were explained by socioeconomic status, physical health, social roles, stress exposure, and, ultimately, by network size and subjective relationship quality. RESULT: Education and income were negatively associated with loneliness and explained racial/ethnic differences in loneliness. Being married largely explained the association between income and loneliness, with positive marital relationships offering the greatest degree of protection against loneliness. Independent risk factors for loneliness included male gender, physical health symptoms, chronic work and/or social stress, small social network, lack of a spousal confidant, and poor-quality social relationships. DISCUSSION: Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate the causal role of social structural and proximal factors in explaining changes in loneliness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/63.6.s375

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic stress associated with loneliness dysregulates biological systems, including the HPA axis and immune system, which are crucial in the onset and persistence of anxiety and depression.

    “Moreover, the chronic stress associated with loneliness dysregulates biological systems, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the immune system, which are crucial in the onset and persistence of anxiety and depression [80–82].”

    From The prospective association of adolescent loneliness and low resilience with anxiety and depression in young adulthood: The HUNT study (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports prior findings linking loneliness to a greater morning rise in cortisol and to gene-transcription changes favoring inflammation. The Results section on stress exposure associates chronic stress with loneliness, but the paper does not establish that loneliness-related chronic stress dysregulates those systems or that this pathway causes the onset or persistence of anxiety and depression. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Objective social isolation can influence perceptions of isolation, but perceived isolation relates more to interaction quality than quantity.

    “Studies using these assessments indicate that objective social isolation can affect perceptions of isolation,23,24 but show that perceived social isolation is more closely related to the quality than the quantity of social interactions.25”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Objective social isolation can influence perceptions of isolation, but perceived isolation relates more to interaction quality than quantity.

    “Studies using these assessments indicate that objective social isolation can affect perceptions of isolation,23,24 but show that perceived social isolation is more closely related to the quality than the quantity of social interactions.25”

    From Social isolation (2011) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Perceived social isolation (or loneliness) reflects the quality of an individual's social interactions rather than their quantity or frequency.

    “Perceived social isolation (or loneliness) reflects the quality of an individual’s social interactions (Hawkley et al., 2008, Peplau, 1978) rather than their quantity or frequency.”

    From Dorsal raphe dopamine neurons represent the experience of social isolation (2016) · cites this paper as Hawkley et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Berkman LF Glass T Berkman LF Kawachi I Social integration, social networks, social support, and health Social epidemiology 2000 New York Oxford University Press 137 173
  2. Cole SW Hawkley LC Arevalo JM Sung CY Rose RM Cacioppo JT Social regulation of gene expression in humans: Glucocorticoid resistance in the leukocyte transcriptome Genome Biology 2007 8 R189.1 R189.13 17854483 PMC2375027
  3. Hobson CJ Kamen J Szostek J Nethercut CM Tiedmann JW Wojnarowicz S Stressful life events: A revision and update of the Social Readjustment Rating Scale International Journal of Stress Management 1998 5 1 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkley, L. C., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Masi, C. M., Thisted, R. A., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hawkley, L. C.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2008-11-01
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
S375-S384
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2135570695
Cited by
666
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG18911, P01AG018911)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, socio-structural factors, relationship quality, socioeconomic status, marital relationships, social network size, racial and ethnic differences, physical health, occupational stress, social stress, middle-aged and older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Chicago, Chronic Disease, Health Status, Humans, Loneliness, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review