Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes.

Daniel T. Gilbert, Jane E. J. Ebert·2002·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

People prefer to make changeable decisions rather than unchangeable decisions because they do not realize that they may be more satisfied with the latter. Photography students believed that having the opportunity to change their minds about which prints to keep would not influence their liking of the prints. However, those who had the opportunity to change their minds liked their prints less than those who did not (Study 1). Although the opportunity to change their minds impaired the postdecisional processes that normally promote satisfaction (Study 2a), most participants wanted to have that opportunity (Study 2b). The results demonstrate that errors in affective forecasting can lead people to behave in ways that do not optimize their happiness and well-being.

Cites (11)

  1. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
    Festinger, Leon · 1957
  2. The case for motivated reasoning.
    Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
    Bartlett, F. C., Burt, Cyril · 1933 · British Journal of Educational Psychology
  4. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
    Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L, Thaler, Richard H · 1991 · Journal of Economic Perspectives
  5. The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
    Steele, Claude M. · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  6. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
    Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L., Thaler, Richard H. · 1990 · Journal of Political Economy
  7. The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1980 · American Psychologist
  8. Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom.
    Schwartz, Barry · 2000 · American Psychologist
  9. Emotion-based choice.
    Mellers, Barbara, Schwartz, Alan, Ritov, Ilana · 1999 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  10. On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms
    Tesser, Abraham · 2000 · Personality and Social Psychology Review

Show all 11 references

Cited by (13)

  1. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
    Mercier, Hugo, Sperber, Dan · 2011 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. Prospection: experiencing the future
    Gilbert, Daniel T., Wilson, Timothy D. · 2007 · Science
  3. Affective Forecasting: Knowing What to Want
    Wilson, Timothy D., Gilbert, Daniel T. · 2005 · Current Directions in Psychological Science
  4. Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling
    Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Hunter, Jeremy · 2003 · Journal of Happiness Studies
  5. Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Opportunity of the Inverted U
    Grant, Adam M., Schwartz, Barry · 2011 · Perspectives on Psychological Science

See all 357

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.503
The paper
Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.4.503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.