Cited by 839Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Emotion-based choice.

Mellers, Barbara, Schwartz, Alan, Ritov, Ilana·1999·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

In this article the authors develop a descriptive theory of choice using anticipated emotions. People are assumed to anticipate how they will feel about the outcomes of decisions and use their predictions to guide choice. The authors measure the pleasure associated with monetary outcomes of gambles and offer an account of judged pleasure called decision affect theory. Then they propose a theory of choices between gambles based on anticipated pleasure. People are assumed to choose the option with greater subjective expected pleasure. Similarities and differences between subjective expected pleasure theory and subjective expected utility theory are discussed. Emotions have powerful effects on choice. Our actual feelings of happiness, sadness, and anger both color and shape our decisions. In addition, our imagined feelings of guilt, elation, or regret influence our decisions. In this article we refer to these two influences as experienced emotions and anticipated emotions. Experienced emotions affect many levels of cognitive processing. When we are in good moods, we are better problem solvers (Isen, 1984, 1987, 1993), more likely to remember happy events (Bower, 1981), more risk seeking (Kahn & Isen, 1993), and more optimistic about the chances of favorable events (Wright & Bower, 1992; Nygren, Isen, Taylor, & Dulin, 1996). When we are in bad moods, we are more likely to recall negative events (Bower, 1981) and overestimate the chances of unfavorable events (Johnson & Tversky, 1983). If we are also aroused, we make less discriminate use of information

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.332

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotion plays a role in decision-making.

    “It is widely acknowledged that emotion plays a role in decision-making, drawing on evidence from numerous behavioral studies using emotional stimuli as well as physiological, neuroimaging, and lesion studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Published
1999-09
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
332-345
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W2068613599
Cited by
839
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 39
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
anticipated emotions, subjective expected utility, experienced emotions, risk seeking, regret, guilt, sadness, anger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review