Heuristics and biases: Expertise and task realism in auditing.
Smith, James F., Kida, Thomas·1991·Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (8)
- Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- The Affect HeuristicSlovic, Paul, Finucane, Melissa, Peters, Ellen, MacGregor, Donald G. · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probabilityTversky, Amos, Koehler, Derek J. · 1994 · Psychological Review
- Varieties of Confirmation BiasKlayman, Joshua · 1995 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and commentsShanteau, James, Stewart, Thomas R · 1992 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Mental Contamination and the Debiasing ProblemWilson, Timothy D., Centerbar, David B., Brekke, Nancy · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- The calibration of expert judgment: heuristics and biases beyond the laboratoryKoehler, Derek J., Brenner, Lyle, Griffin, Dale · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
- Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking TheoryKaur, Harmanpreet, Adar, Eytan, Gilbert, Eric, Lampe, Cliff · 2022 · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.