Feeling good^doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work^organizational spontaneity relationship.

George, Jennifer M., Brief, Arthur P.·1992·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Five forms of organizational spontaneity are described (helping co-workers, protecting the organization, making constructive suggestions, developing oneself, and spreading goodwill). Organizational spontaneity is compared with the seemingly analogous constructs of organizational citizenship behavior and prosocial organizational behavior. Based on a selective review of the literature, a multilevel model of spontaneity is presented. Positive mood at work is a pivotal construct in the model and posited as the direct precursor of organizational spontaneity. Primary work-group characteristics, the affective tone of the primary work group, affective disposition, life event history, and contextual characteristics are proposed to have direct or indirect effects, or both, on positive mood at work. Motivational bases of organizational spontaneity also are described. The model and its implications are discussed.

Cites (14)

  1. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
    Bandura, Albert · 1982 · American Psychologist
  2. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
    Zajonc, R. B. · 1980 · American Psychologist
  3. Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
    Taylor, Shelley E., Brown, Jonathon D. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
    Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. Mood and memory
    Bower, Gordon H. · 1981 · American Psychologist
  7. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
    Costa, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment
  8. Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity.
    Watson, David, Pennebaker, James W. · 1989 · Psychological Review
  9. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving.
    Isen, Alice M., Daubman, Kimberly A., Nowicki, Gary P. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  10. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation.
    Berkowitz, Leonard · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 14 references

Cited by (56)

  1. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
    Diener, Ed, Suh, Eunkook M., Lucas, Richard E., Smith, Heidi L. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
    Rhoades, Linda, Eisenberger, Robert · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
    McAllister, D. J. · 1995 · Academy of Management Journal
  4. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
    Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research
    Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie Beth, Bachrach, Daniel G. · 2000 · Journal of Management

See all 1,609

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeling good^doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work^organizational spontaneity relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.112.2.310
The paper
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good^doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work^organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.2.310

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.