Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons.

Kasof, Joseph·1993·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Researchers often use sex-typed names (e.g., John vs. Joan) to identify stimulus persons' sex, assuming that such names communicate sex only. In fact, however, such names also create impressions that have little or nothing to do with sex. Study 1 analyzed the age connotations, intellectual-competence connotations, and attractiveness of sex-typed names used in 230 published studies on sexism and fear of success. On each of these variables, the literature was pervasively confounded in a manner favoring male stimulus persons. Study 2 found that the name biases reported in Study 1 were positively correlated with outcome measures in a sample of sexism studies, but only when names were presented with limited other information. Possible causes of the bias are discussed, and recommendations for naming stimulus persons are presented, including a list of male names and female names matched on several key variables.

Cites (5)

  1. What is beautiful is good
    Dion, Karen, Berscheid, Ellen, Walster, Elaine · 1972 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.
    Eagly, Alice H., Ashmore, Richard D., Makhijani, Mona G., Longo, Laura C. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language.
    Semin, Gün R., Fiedler, Klaus · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings.
    Kraiger, Kurt, Ford, J. Kevin · 1985 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Information utility and the multiple source effect
    Harkins, Stephen G., Petty, Richard E. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 5 references

Cited by (10)

  1. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
    Eagly, Alice H., Karau, Steven J. · 2002 · Psychological Review
  2. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
    Greenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 1995 · Psychological Review
  3. Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Research on Attitudes, Gender Stereotypes, and Judgments of Competence
    Eagly, Alice H., Mladinic, Antonio · 1994 · European Review of Social Psychology
  4. The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization
    Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, Leonardelli, Geoffrey J., Phillips, Katherine W. · 2008 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  5. Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.
    Rosette, Ashleigh Shelby, Tost, Leigh Plunkett · 2010 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 189

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.140
The paper
Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.